Ethical Challenges Faced by Individuals with Disabilities in Accessing Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Barriers, Discrimination, and Autonomy in Decision-Making.

Background: Despite progressive legal frameworks such as the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016, and India's ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), persons with disabilities (PWD) continue to face ethical challenges in accessing equitable healthcare in India. The objective of the study is to systematically synthesize evidence on ethical issues related to healthcare access, specifically barriers, discrimination, and autonomy in decision-making affecting PWD in India. Methodology: A systematic search of seven electronic databases and grey literature sources was conducted for studies published between January 2005 and March 2025. Peer-reviewed quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies, along with relevant policy and advocacy reports, were eligible. Study quality was appraised using STROBE and CASP checklists for peer-reviewed literature, while grey literature was assessed based on source credibility and methodological transparency. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251028645). Results: Thirty sources were included, comprising 22 peer-reviewed studies and 8 grey literature or policy documents. Most peer-reviewed studies were of moderate methodological quality. The synthesis revealed persistent physical, financial, informational, and communication barriers to healthcare access. Attitudinal and institutional discrimination by healthcare providers was commonly reported, and autonomy was frequently compromised through substituted decision-making and inaccessible consent processes, particularly among individuals with intellectual or psychosocial disabilities. Ethical challenges were more pronounced in rural, tribal, and socio-economically marginalized populations. Conclusion: Despite legal protections, significant ethical inequities in healthcare access for PWD persist in India. Strengthening implementation of existing laws, promoting disability-inclusive healthcare training, operationalizing supported decision-making, and improving disability-disaggregated health data are critical to advancing ethical, equitable, and inclusive healthcare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-07-23
Primary Topic
Disability Rights and Representation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical Challenges Faced by Individuals with Disabilities in Accessing Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Barriers, Discrimination, and Autonomy in Decision-Making.

Nani Gopal Das, Satabdi Saha, Amitava Baidya, Nani Gopal Das
PubMed
Disability Rights and Representation
article

Ethical Challenges Faced by Individuals with Disabilities in Accessing Healthcare: A Systematic Review of Barriers, Discrimination, and Autonomy in Decision-Making.

Nani Gopal Das, Satabdi Saha, Amitava Baidya, Nani Gopal Das
article en

Abstract

Background: Despite progressive legal frameworks such as the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016, and India's ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD), persons with disabilities (PWD) continue to face ethical challenges in accessing equitable healthcare in India. The objective of the study is to systematically synthesize evidence on ethical issues related to healthcare access, specifically barriers, discrimination, and autonomy in decision-making affecting PWD in India. Methodology: A systematic search of seven electronic databases and grey literature sources was conducted for studies published between January 2005 and March 2025. Peer-reviewed quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies, along with relevant policy and advocacy reports, were eligible. Study quality was appraised using STROBE and CASP checklists for peer-reviewed literature, while grey literature was assessed based on source credibility and methodological transparency. The review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251028645). Results: Thirty sources were included, comprising 22 peer-reviewed studies and 8 grey literature or policy documents. Most peer-reviewed studies were of moderate methodological quality. The synthesis revealed persistent physical, financial, informational, and communication barriers to healthcare access. Attitudinal and institutional discrimination by healthcare providers was commonly reported, and autonomy was frequently compromised through substituted decision-making and inaccessible consent processes, particularly among individuals with intellectual or psychosocial disabilities. Ethical challenges were more pronounced in rural, tribal, and socio-economically marginalized populations. Conclusion: Despite legal protections, significant ethical inequities in healthcare access for PWD persist in India. Strengthening implementation of existing laws, promoting disability-inclusive healthcare training, operationalizing supported decision-making, and improving disability-disaggregated health data are critical to advancing ethical, equitable, and inclusive healthcare.

PubMedVol. 66(6)
Tripura Medical College & Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Memorial Teaching Hospital (IN), Agartala Government Medical College (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Disability Rights and Representation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.