Postoperative Vaginal Cleansing with Chlorhexidine Gluconate Versus Povidone-Iodine for Prevention of Post-Caesarean Endometritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Maternal infectious morbidity is a common complication of caesarean section. Despite prophylactic antibiotics, endometritis following caesarean section is still a big challenge. Preoperative vaginal cleansing with povidone may not be feasible in emergencies necessitating its use postoperatively, and comparing its efficacy with cheaper and readily available solutions. The aim is to compare the effectiveness of post-operative vaginal cleansing with povidone-iodine(PI) versus chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) in reducing post-caesarean endometritis. Methodology: This was a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. One hundred and twenty participants had post-operative vaginal cleansing with Povidone-iodine and one hundred and nineteen with Chlorhexidine gluconate, with attrition of 2 and 3 participants from the PI and CHG groups, respectively. Both groups received prophylactic antibiotics. They were reviewed for endometritis daily till discharge or up to 7 days. Data was analysed with SPSS. Result: The study showed that post-caesarean vaginal cleansing with either agent did not detect any case of endometritis. Although the duration of ruptured membranes prior to surgery was statistically significant, with a mean of 19.26±44.4, 8.7±10.9 for PI and CHG, respectively, p-0.038; RR-0.627-21.561. Post-operative fever was recorded in the PI group (0.02%) but was not statistically significant. p=2.773; RR=1.667; 95%CI (0.624-3.957). No adverse effect was reported with either agent, Anaphlactic reaction=0, and local irritation was 1.67% with P=0.498. Conclusion: Post-operative vaginal cleansing with CHG was not superior to PI in preventing the occurrence of post-Caesarean endometritis. Although CHG had a better side effect profile when compared with PI, the findings were not statistically significant. CHG may be recommended for use following result from multicentre studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-07-23
Primary Topic
Surgical site infection prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Postoperative Vaginal Cleansing with Chlorhexidine Gluconate Versus Povidone-Iodine for Prevention of Post-Caesarean Endometritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Assumpta Nnenna Nweke, Chizoba Malachy Onyema, Ugochukwu Raphael Chikezie, Ifeoma Cecilia Uche-Omovoh et al.
PubMed
Surgical site infection prevention
article

Postoperative Vaginal Cleansing with Chlorhexidine Gluconate Versus Povidone-Iodine for Prevention of Post-Caesarean Endometritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Assumpta Nnenna Nweke, Chizoba Malachy Onyema, Ugochukwu Raphael Chikezie, Ifeoma Cecilia Uche-Omovoh, Godwin Mmeregini, Christian Mgbafulu, Chidiadi Natrhan Ekpe, Ndukwe Wilson Nwigboji, Nwambeke Charles Edene
article en

Abstract

Background: Maternal infectious morbidity is a common complication of caesarean section. Despite prophylactic antibiotics, endometritis following caesarean section is still a big challenge. Preoperative vaginal cleansing with povidone may not be feasible in emergencies necessitating its use postoperatively, and comparing its efficacy with cheaper and readily available solutions. The aim is to compare the effectiveness of post-operative vaginal cleansing with povidone-iodine(PI) versus chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) in reducing post-caesarean endometritis. Methodology: This was a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. One hundred and twenty participants had post-operative vaginal cleansing with Povidone-iodine and one hundred and nineteen with Chlorhexidine gluconate, with attrition of 2 and 3 participants from the PI and CHG groups, respectively. Both groups received prophylactic antibiotics. They were reviewed for endometritis daily till discharge or up to 7 days. Data was analysed with SPSS. Result: The study showed that post-caesarean vaginal cleansing with either agent did not detect any case of endometritis. Although the duration of ruptured membranes prior to surgery was statistically significant, with a mean of 19.26±44.4, 8.7±10.9 for PI and CHG, respectively, p-0.038; RR-0.627-21.561. Post-operative fever was recorded in the PI group (0.02%) but was not statistically significant. p=2.773; RR=1.667; 95%CI (0.624-3.957). No adverse effect was reported with either agent, Anaphlactic reaction=0, and local irritation was 1.67% with P=0.498. Conclusion: Post-operative vaginal cleansing with CHG was not superior to PI in preventing the occurrence of post-Caesarean endometritis. Although CHG had a better side effect profile when compared with PI, the findings were not statistically significant. CHG may be recommended for use following result from multicentre studies.

PubMedVol. 66(6)
Federal Teaching Hospital Abakaliki (NG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Surgical site infection prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.