Receipt of cancer care among stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer patients with and without intellectual or developmental disabilities: A population-based retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: Little is known about non-curative lung cancer care, including palliative care, for adults with intellectual, or developmental disabilities. Clinical management may vary due to health status, ability to communicate, access to inclusive healthcare, and healthcare bias. AIM: We examined the receipt of cancer-directed consultations, treatments and palliative care among stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with and without intellectual or developmental disabilities. DESIGN: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study using provincial routinely collected health data. Receipt of consultations with surgeons, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists, receipt of systemic therapy, radiation, and surgery as well as receipt of palliative care in the year following diagnosis were compared between people with and without intellectual or developmental disabilities. Cause-specific Cox proportional hazards regression, accounting for death as a competing event, was used. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Adults diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC between 2010 and 2022 in Ontario, Canada. RESULTS: The study included 33,184 individuals diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC (n intellectual or developmental disabilities = 106). Adults with intellectual or developmental disabilities were significantly less likely to receive any cancer-directed consultation (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.78), any cancer-directed cancer treatment (HR = 0.52; 95% CI 0.39-0.70), and radiation or systemic therapy (HR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.36-0.66) than non-disabled adults. There was no statistical difference in receipt of palliative care (HR = 1.15; 95% CI 0.93-1.41). CONCLUSION: These findings contribute to an emerging evidence base documenting differences in cancer treatment and outcomes among adults with intellectual or developmental disabilities. Person-center research is needed that examines end-of-life lung cancer care treatment decision-making to identify and mitigate barriers to optimal management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Palliative Medicine
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163261464345
Primary Topic
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Receipt of cancer care among stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer patients with and without intellectual or developmental disabilities: A population-based retrospective cohort study

Alyson L Mahar, Catherine Goldie, Tara C. Horrill, Rebecca Hansford et al.
Palliative Medicine
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
article

Receipt of cancer care among stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer patients with and without intellectual or developmental disabilities: A population-based retrospective cohort study

Alyson L Mahar, Catherine Goldie, Tara C. Horrill, Rebecca Hansford, Laura Davis, Rebecca Griffiths, Timothy P. Hanna, Paul Nguyen
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Little is known about non-curative lung cancer care, including palliative care, for adults with intellectual, or developmental disabilities. Clinical management may vary due to health status, ability to communicate, access to inclusive healthcare, and healthcare bias. AIM: We examined the receipt of cancer-directed consultations, treatments and palliative care among stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with and without intellectual or developmental disabilities. DESIGN: This was a population-based retrospective cohort study using provincial routinely collected health data. Receipt of consultations with surgeons, medical oncologists, and radiation oncologists, receipt of systemic therapy, radiation, and surgery as well as receipt of palliative care in the year following diagnosis were compared between people with and without intellectual or developmental disabilities. Cause-specific Cox proportional hazards regression, accounting for death as a competing event, was used. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Adults diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC between 2010 and 2022 in Ontario, Canada. RESULTS: The study included 33,184 individuals diagnosed with stage IV NSCLC (n intellectual or developmental disabilities = 106). Adults with intellectual or developmental disabilities were significantly less likely to receive any cancer-directed consultation (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.49-0.78), any cancer-directed cancer treatment (HR = 0.52; 95% CI 0.39-0.70), and radiation or systemic therapy (HR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.36-0.66) than non-disabled adults. There was no statistical difference in receipt of palliative care (HR = 1.15; 95% CI 0.93-1.41). CONCLUSION: These findings contribute to an emerging evidence base documenting differences in cancer treatment and outcomes among adults with intellectual or developmental disabilities. Person-center research is needed that examines end-of-life lung cancer care treatment decision-making to identify and mitigate barriers to optimal management.

Palliative Medicine
Queen's University (CA), University of Manitoba (CA)
Canadian Cancer Society
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Down syndrome and intellectual disability research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.