Drawing-Centred and Associated Visual-Representation Strategies in Anatomy and Histology Education: A Systematic Evidence Map

Drawing-centred and drawing-associated visual-representation strategies are used in anatomy and histology education, but the literature spans learner-generated drawing, guided drawing, screencasts, multisensory approaches, and model-based visual abstraction. This systematic evidence map examined their use and conducted an exploratory quantitative synthesis of objective learning outcomes among health science students. The review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261360533) and reported according to PRISMA 2020. Searches finalized in April 2026 covered PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL, and MEDLINE via Ovid, with backward and forward citation searching. After deduplication and supplementary searching, 1129 records were screened, 181 full-text reports were assessed, and 100 unique studies were included in the evidence map. Fifty-one studies were preliminary quantitative candidates. Six independent contrasts met the numerical meta-analysis criteria; however, only four were sufficiently aligned with drawing-centred learning to form the primary quantitative subset. Random-effects meta-analysis using Hedges g, REML estimation, and Hartung–Knapp confidence intervals yielded a positive but statistically uncertain primary estimate (g = 0.18, 95% CI −0.27 to 0.64; I2 = 50.1%; τ2 = 0.037; prediction interval −0.85 to 1.22). The broader six-contrast model was also positive but uncertain (g = 0.29, 95% CI −0.08 to 0.67). Certainty of evidence was very low. These analyses are exploratory rather than confirmatory because few conceptually comparable studies were available.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Medical Education
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ime5030067
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Drawing-Centred and Associated Visual-Representation Strategies in Anatomy and Histology Education: A Systematic Evidence Map

Juan A. Sanchis‐Gimeno, Macarena Rodríguez-Luengo, Juan José Valenzuela‐Fuenzalida, Julio Figueroa-Puig et al.
International Medical Education
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

Drawing-Centred and Associated Visual-Representation Strategies in Anatomy and Histology Education: A Systematic Evidence Map

Juan A. Sanchis‐Gimeno, Macarena Rodríguez-Luengo, Juan José Valenzuela‐Fuenzalida, Julio Figueroa-Puig, Gloria Cifuentes-Suazo, Alejandro Bruna-Mejías, Mathias Orellana‐Donoso, Juan José Cabezas-Salgado, Gustavo Oyanedel, María P. Moya, Valentina Perez-Lira, Diego Santander-Chavez, Mathis Miranda-Schoen, Cristopher Blackwood-Espinoza, Loreto Paez-Alliendes, Rodrigo Vega-Salces, Diego Luengo
article en

Abstract

Drawing-centred and drawing-associated visual-representation strategies are used in anatomy and histology education, but the literature spans learner-generated drawing, guided drawing, screencasts, multisensory approaches, and model-based visual abstraction. This systematic evidence map examined their use and conducted an exploratory quantitative synthesis of objective learning outcomes among health science students. The review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261360533) and reported according to PRISMA 2020. Searches finalized in April 2026 covered PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL, and MEDLINE via Ovid, with backward and forward citation searching. After deduplication and supplementary searching, 1129 records were screened, 181 full-text reports were assessed, and 100 unique studies were included in the evidence map. Fifty-one studies were preliminary quantitative candidates. Six independent contrasts met the numerical meta-analysis criteria; however, only four were sufficiently aligned with drawing-centred learning to form the primary quantitative subset. Random-effects meta-analysis using Hedges g, REML estimation, and Hartung–Knapp confidence intervals yielded a positive but statistically uncertain primary estimate (g = 0.18, 95% CI −0.27 to 0.64; I2 = 50.1%; τ2 = 0.037; prediction interval −0.85 to 1.22). The broader six-contrast model was also positive but uncertain (g = 0.29, 95% CI −0.08 to 0.67). Certainty of evidence was very low. These analyses are exploratory rather than confirmatory because few conceptually comparable studies were available.

International Medical EducationVol. 5(3)
Universidad Mayor (CL), Universitat de València (ES), Catholic University of the Maule (CL), Universidad Autónoma de Chile (CL), San Sebastián University (CL), Viña del Mar University (CL), Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción (CL), Universidad Bernardo O'Higgins (CL), University of the Americas (CL), Universidad de Playa Ancha de Ciencias de la Educación (CL), Finis Terrae University (CL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.