What is the Protection Effect of a Compulsory Nat-Cat Insurance System? An Italian Case Study

Abstract The rising frequency and severity of climate-related disasters calls for stronger financial protection mechanisms. Natural catastrophe (Nat-Cat) insurance is a key ex ante tool to mitigate vulnerability and reduce reliance on post-disaster public aid. In Italy, Law No. 213/2023 introduced compulsory Nat-Cat insurance for businesses, aiming to transfer part of the risk to the private sector. This paper combines a legal assessment of the reform with a model-based prediction grounded in European data to evaluate its potential effectiveness. The results show that greater insurance coverage lowers the Protection Gap Score (PGS), but the effect is uneven: it is most effective for floods and wildfires and at low to intermediate levels of risk, while it becomes negligible under extreme hazard conditions. These findings highlight both the potential and the limits of compulsory insurance. The study concludes that Law No. 213/2023 is a step forward for Italy’s financial resilience, but that its success depends on compliance incentives, broader coverage, and integration with preventive risk management policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Italian Economic Journal
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40797-026-00402-4
Primary Topic
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What is the Protection Effect of a Compulsory Nat-Cat Insurance System? An Italian Case Study

Benedetta Coluccia, Marta Infantino, Donatella Porrini
Italian Economic Journal
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
article

What is the Protection Effect of a Compulsory Nat-Cat Insurance System? An Italian Case Study

Benedetta Coluccia, Marta Infantino, Donatella Porrini
article en

Abstract

Abstract The rising frequency and severity of climate-related disasters calls for stronger financial protection mechanisms. Natural catastrophe (Nat-Cat) insurance is a key ex ante tool to mitigate vulnerability and reduce reliance on post-disaster public aid. In Italy, Law No. 213/2023 introduced compulsory Nat-Cat insurance for businesses, aiming to transfer part of the risk to the private sector. This paper combines a legal assessment of the reform with a model-based prediction grounded in European data to evaluate its potential effectiveness. The results show that greater insurance coverage lowers the Protection Gap Score (PGS), but the effect is uneven: it is most effective for floods and wildfires and at low to intermediate levels of risk, while it becomes negligible under extreme hazard conditions. These findings highlight both the potential and the limits of compulsory insurance. The study concludes that Law No. 213/2023 is a step forward for Italy’s financial resilience, but that its success depends on compliance incentives, broader coverage, and integration with preventive risk management policies.

Italian Economic Journal
University of Trieste (IT), University of Salento (IT), Department of Cultural Heritage (LT), Pegaso University (IT)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What is the Protection Effect of a Compulsory Nat-Cat Insurance System? An Italian Case Study — Benedetta Coluccia, Marta Infantino, et al. · Italian Economic Journal (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS