Margin Status and Local Recurrence in Early‐Stage Oral‐Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Analysis of Reresection Outcomes

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of surgical margin status and re-resection on local recurrence (LR) in early-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 352 patients with cT1-2N0 OCSCC. SETTING: Tertiary care center from 2005 to 2024. METHODS: Patients were stratified by margin status: initial negative (n = 325), re-resected to negative (RRN) (n = 20), and positive (n = 7). Initial margin status was determined intraoperatively with frozen sections using specimen-based or tumor bed-based sampling. Primary outcome was 3-year LR. Chi-square tests and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated differences across groups, accounting for potential confounders, for example, adjuvant treatment. RESULTS: The most common subsite was the tongue (60.2%). 75.9% underwent elective neck dissection. 5.7% had an initial positive margin RRN. 4.8% and 22.7% received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy, respectively. LR rates were 10.5% for initial negative, 35.0% for RRN, and 42.9% for positive margins despite re-resection. Compared to patients with initial negative, those with positive (hazard ratio [HR] 5.67, 95% CI 1.74-18.61) and RRN (HR 3.32, 95% CI 1.47-7.49) margins showed higher rates of LR. There was no significant difference in LR rates between positive versus RRN margins (P = .374). After controlling for adjuvant therapy and margin assessment method, positive (aHR 8.32, 95% CI 2.31-29.9) and RRN (aHR 3.82, 95% CI 1.68-8.68) margins remained associated with higher LR. Adjuvant therapy trended toward a protective effect (aHR 0.53, 95% CI 0.24-1.17, P = .117). CONCLUSION: RRN margins should not be considered oncologically equivalent to initial negative margins, as demonstrated by higher 3-year LR rates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Otolaryngology
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.70343
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Margin Status and Local Recurrence in Early‐Stage Oral‐Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Analysis of Reresection Outcomes

Rahul Alapati, Hannah J. Brown, Andrés M. Bur, Uma Ramesh et al.
Otolaryngology
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

Margin Status and Local Recurrence in Early‐Stage Oral‐Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Analysis of Reresection Outcomes

Rahul Alapati, Hannah J. Brown, Andrés M. Bur, Uma Ramesh, N Wang, Ameen M. Amanian
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of surgical margin status and re-resection on local recurrence (LR) in early-stage oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of 352 patients with cT1-2N0 OCSCC. SETTING: Tertiary care center from 2005 to 2024. METHODS: Patients were stratified by margin status: initial negative (n = 325), re-resected to negative (RRN) (n = 20), and positive (n = 7). Initial margin status was determined intraoperatively with frozen sections using specimen-based or tumor bed-based sampling. Primary outcome was 3-year LR. Chi-square tests and Cox proportional hazards models evaluated differences across groups, accounting for potential confounders, for example, adjuvant treatment. RESULTS: The most common subsite was the tongue (60.2%). 75.9% underwent elective neck dissection. 5.7% had an initial positive margin RRN. 4.8% and 22.7% received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and radiotherapy, respectively. LR rates were 10.5% for initial negative, 35.0% for RRN, and 42.9% for positive margins despite re-resection. Compared to patients with initial negative, those with positive (hazard ratio [HR] 5.67, 95% CI 1.74-18.61) and RRN (HR 3.32, 95% CI 1.47-7.49) margins showed higher rates of LR. There was no significant difference in LR rates between positive versus RRN margins (P = .374). After controlling for adjuvant therapy and margin assessment method, positive (aHR 8.32, 95% CI 2.31-29.9) and RRN (aHR 3.82, 95% CI 1.68-8.68) margins remained associated with higher LR. Adjuvant therapy trended toward a protective effect (aHR 0.53, 95% CI 0.24-1.17, P = .117). CONCLUSION: RRN margins should not be considered oncologically equivalent to initial negative margins, as demonstrated by higher 3-year LR rates.

Otolaryngology
University of Kansas Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.