Functional-level analysis of post-stroke social participation: A nationwide cohort study using the ICF framework

BACKGROUND: Social participation is a key goal in stroke rehabilitation, but its influencing factors vary by functional status. Few large-scale studies have categorized patients by functional level and analyzed associated factors using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. OBJECTIVE: To identify determinants of social participation 12 months after stroke, stratified by functional level. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 2,695 stroke survivors from a nationwide cohort in Korea. Participants were stratified into five groups based on Fugl-Meyer Assessment scores: Severe, Marked, Moderate, Slight, and Unimpaired. METHODS: Social participation was measured using the Reintegration to Normal Living Index. Independent variables were categorized into four ICF domains: personal factors, body functions and structures, activities and participation, and environmental factors. Multivariate regression analyses were performed by functional group. RESULTS: Predictors varied significantly across functional levels. In the Severe group (FMA < 50), environmental factors (home accessibility and caregiver-related variables such as age and relationship) were the primary determinants. Conversely, in higher-functioning groups (FMA ≥ 85), social participation was more strongly influenced by body functions and structures (cognitive, language, and psychosocial functions) and activities and participation factors (vocational status). Across all groups, activities and participation (functional independence and health-related quality of life) remained consistent positive predictors, while environmental barriers (caregiver burden) were universal constraints. CONCLUSION: Determinants of social participation differ by functional status: individuals with lower functional levels are more significantly affected by environmental factors, whereas those with higher function face greater barriers related to body functions and structures. These findings suggest that stroke rehabilitation must provide functional-level-specific interventions, moving beyond physical recovery to address these distinct multidimensional barriers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354691
Primary Topic
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Functional-level analysis of post-stroke social participation: A nationwide cohort study using the ICF framework

Deog Young Kim, Jeonghoon Ahn, Ji Hong Min, Yang‐Soo Lee et al.
PLoS ONE
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
article

Functional-level analysis of post-stroke social participation: A nationwide cohort study using the ICF framework

Deog Young Kim, Jeonghoon Ahn, Ji Hong Min, Yang‐Soo Lee, Min Cheol Joo, Yong‐Il Shin, Min‐Keun Song, H H Lee, Lee Js, Gyung Jae Oh, Jinhee Choi, Sung-Hwa Ko, Won Hyuk Chang, Junhee Han, Min Kyun Sohn, Yun-Hee Kim, So Young Lee
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Social participation is a key goal in stroke rehabilitation, but its influencing factors vary by functional status. Few large-scale studies have categorized patients by functional level and analyzed associated factors using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) framework. OBJECTIVE: To identify determinants of social participation 12 months after stroke, stratified by functional level. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted on 2,695 stroke survivors from a nationwide cohort in Korea. Participants were stratified into five groups based on Fugl-Meyer Assessment scores: Severe, Marked, Moderate, Slight, and Unimpaired. METHODS: Social participation was measured using the Reintegration to Normal Living Index. Independent variables were categorized into four ICF domains: personal factors, body functions and structures, activities and participation, and environmental factors. Multivariate regression analyses were performed by functional group. RESULTS: Predictors varied significantly across functional levels. In the Severe group (FMA < 50), environmental factors (home accessibility and caregiver-related variables such as age and relationship) were the primary determinants. Conversely, in higher-functioning groups (FMA ≥ 85), social participation was more strongly influenced by body functions and structures (cognitive, language, and psychosocial functions) and activities and participation factors (vocational status). Across all groups, activities and participation (functional independence and health-related quality of life) remained consistent positive predictors, while environmental barriers (caregiver burden) were universal constraints. CONCLUSION: Determinants of social participation differ by functional status: individuals with lower functional levels are more significantly affected by environmental factors, whereas those with higher function face greater barriers related to body functions and structures. These findings suggest that stroke rehabilitation must provide functional-level-specific interventions, moving beyond physical recovery to address these distinct multidimensional barriers.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(7)
Ewha Womans University (KR), Hallym University (KR), Yonsei University (KR), Chungnam National University (KR), Konkuk University (KR), Kyungpook National University Hospital (KR), Samsung Medical Center (KR), Chonnam National University Hospital (KR), Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital (KR), Korea Center for Disease Control and Prevention (KR), Wonkwang University (KR), Jeju National University (KR), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.