Military Threats to and Resilience of the EU’s Future Members

This article provides a survey of the military instruments that third state actors might use against the nine EU candidate countries (CCs) of the Western Balkans (WB) and Eastern Neighbourhood (EN) in ways that could delay or derail their integration into the European Union. It proposes indicators that might be used to assess their resilience against these instruments and applies this framework to determine a composite military-security resilience index (low–medium–high) for each CC-threat combination. Additionally, it assesses the EU’s support for military-security resilience-building in the two regions through the application of its own foreign and security policy tools. Finally, in the context of the dramatic turn in Europe’s security situation driven by Russia’s war in Ukraine, it examines how aspects of both the response of the CC and the changes in the EU’s support to them in this domain might be interpreted through control and protean power theory. It concludes that while these responses can largely be understood as manifestations of control power, they have, at least in the cases of Ukraine and the EU, demonstrated some protean power which has produced substantial rewards. This might serve as inspiration for a much stronger commitment by the EU to military-security resilience building in the WB and EN.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Foreign Affairs Review
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/eerr2026027
Primary Topic
Peacebuilding and International Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Military Threats to and Resilience of the EU’s Future Members

Felix Gasper, Tony Lawrence, Steven Blockmans
European Foreign Affairs Review
Peacebuilding and International Security
article

Military Threats to and Resilience of the EU’s Future Members

Felix Gasper, Tony Lawrence, Steven Blockmans
article en

Abstract

This article provides a survey of the military instruments that third state actors might use against the nine EU candidate countries (CCs) of the Western Balkans (WB) and Eastern Neighbourhood (EN) in ways that could delay or derail their integration into the European Union. It proposes indicators that might be used to assess their resilience against these instruments and applies this framework to determine a composite military-security resilience index (low–medium–high) for each CC-threat combination. Additionally, it assesses the EU’s support for military-security resilience-building in the two regions through the application of its own foreign and security policy tools. Finally, in the context of the dramatic turn in Europe’s security situation driven by Russia’s war in Ukraine, it examines how aspects of both the response of the CC and the changes in the EU’s support to them in this domain might be interpreted through control and protean power theory. It concludes that while these responses can largely be understood as manifestations of control power, they have, at least in the cases of Ukraine and the EU, demonstrated some protean power which has produced substantial rewards. This might serve as inspiration for a much stronger commitment by the EU to military-security resilience building in the WB and EN.

European Foreign Affairs ReviewVol. 31(Issue SI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Peacebuilding and International Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Military Threats to and Resilience of the EU’s Future Members — Felix Gasper, Tony Lawrence, et al. · European Foreign Affairs Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS