Trust, Participation, and Power: Community Perspectives from the Equity in Public Health Initiative

Health disparities arise from unequal power relations shaping resource allocation, governance, and community agency. Community power is a key mechanism for addressing disparities. This study examines how visible, hidden, and invisible power operate within a U.S. county to inform inclusive governance. We conducted seven focus groups with Black and Hispanic residents (n = 68) and sixteen semi-structured interviews with elected officials, government staff, and advocacy leaders in Greenville County, South Carolina. Data were collected between March and December 2024. Transcripts were collaboratively coded in NVivo and analyzed using thematic analysis guided by Heller et al.'s Three Faces of Power framework. Visible power appeared through inequitable resource distribution, limited transparency, and barriers to civic participation. Hidden power functioned through faith based organizations, schools, nonprofits, and social media, connecting residents with decision makers. Invisible power reflected how socioeconomic status, race and ethnicity, immigration, and language shaped perceptions of agency and trust. Participants called for participatory structures that move beyond consultation toward shared authority and sustained engagement. Strengthening community power through structural reforms, inclusive governance practices, and targeted civic engagement may improve health outcomes and reduce disparities. Future research should examine scalable co-governance models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Community Health
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-026-01612-8
Primary Topic
Community Health and Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trust, Participation, and Power: Community Perspectives from the Equity in Public Health Initiative

Sarah Gonzales, S. Wills, Shaniece Criss, Melissa Fair et al.
Journal of Community Health
Community Health and Development
article

Trust, Participation, and Power: Community Perspectives from the Equity in Public Health Initiative

Sarah Gonzales, S. Wills, Shaniece Criss, Melissa Fair, Dalmondeh D. Nayreau, Jody Teel, Vanessa Rodriguez, Jennifer Woollery, Vaishnavi Bharadwaj, Roger S. Abim-Karmon, Hannah G. Kim, Adia Bennon
article en

Abstract

Health disparities arise from unequal power relations shaping resource allocation, governance, and community agency. Community power is a key mechanism for addressing disparities. This study examines how visible, hidden, and invisible power operate within a U.S. county to inform inclusive governance. We conducted seven focus groups with Black and Hispanic residents (n = 68) and sixteen semi-structured interviews with elected officials, government staff, and advocacy leaders in Greenville County, South Carolina. Data were collected between March and December 2024. Transcripts were collaboratively coded in NVivo and analyzed using thematic analysis guided by Heller et al.'s Three Faces of Power framework. Visible power appeared through inequitable resource distribution, limited transparency, and barriers to civic participation. Hidden power functioned through faith based organizations, schools, nonprofits, and social media, connecting residents with decision makers. Invisible power reflected how socioeconomic status, race and ethnicity, immigration, and language shaped perceptions of agency and trust. Participants called for participatory structures that move beyond consultation toward shared authority and sustained engagement. Strengthening community power through structural reforms, inclusive governance practices, and targeted civic engagement may improve health outcomes and reduce disparities. Future research should examine scalable co-governance models.

Journal of Community Health
Greenville College (US), Furman University (US)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Furman University
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Community Health and Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.