Co-Design for Ageing: From Participation to Systemic Change

Although public-facing services are vital to daily life, their increasing digitisation marginalises ageing populations. Community-led, participatory approaches offer a pathway to more inclusive, equitable, and responsive service design; however, these practices remain fragmented and limited in long-term impact. We used a thematic review to examine the application of community-led practices in the context of ageing, focusing on public services, healthcare, and hybrid service systems. Sources published between 2020 and 2025 were identified through structured searches across Scopus and the ACM Digital Library. By synthesising contributions from co-design, participatory design, living labs, cultural probes, and intergenerational approaches, this research identifies their value and limitations in supporting older adults. While co-design has generated valuable insights into the lived experiences of ageing citizens, practices are constrained by short-termism, methodological fragility, and uneven inclusivity – particularly in hybrid and digital-first service contexts. We advocate shifting from project-bound engagements to more systemic, long-term, and policy-aligned co-design models that address the relational and collective dimensions of ageing, supported by a framework embedding co-design as a systemic innovation in ageing futures. This review contributes to ongoing debates in design, health, and social policy by identifying future directions for embedding co-design as a sustainable practice in ageing futures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
CoDesign
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2026.2707238
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-Design for Ageing: From Participation to Systemic Change

Hosam Al‐Samarraie, Shichao Zhao, Kamarin Merritt, Pınar Yelmi
CoDesign
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
article

Co-Design for Ageing: From Participation to Systemic Change

Hosam Al‐Samarraie, Shichao Zhao, Kamarin Merritt, Pınar Yelmi
article en

Abstract

Although public-facing services are vital to daily life, their increasing digitisation marginalises ageing populations. Community-led, participatory approaches offer a pathway to more inclusive, equitable, and responsive service design; however, these practices remain fragmented and limited in long-term impact. We used a thematic review to examine the application of community-led practices in the context of ageing, focusing on public services, healthcare, and hybrid service systems. Sources published between 2020 and 2025 were identified through structured searches across Scopus and the ACM Digital Library. By synthesising contributions from co-design, participatory design, living labs, cultural probes, and intergenerational approaches, this research identifies their value and limitations in supporting older adults. While co-design has generated valuable insights into the lived experiences of ageing citizens, practices are constrained by short-termism, methodological fragility, and uneven inclusivity – particularly in hybrid and digital-first service contexts. We advocate shifting from project-bound engagements to more systemic, long-term, and policy-aligned co-design models that address the relational and collective dimensions of ageing, supported by a framework embedding co-design as a systemic innovation in ageing futures. This review contributes to ongoing debates in design, health, and social policy by identifying future directions for embedding co-design as a sustainable practice in ageing futures.

CoDesign
University of Leeds (GB), Oregon State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.