Research Progress on Low-Carbon Ironmaking Technologies for China’s Iron and Steel Industry Under the Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality Goals

Under China’s “carbon peaking before 2030 and carbon neutrality before 2060” targets, the low-carbon transformation of the ironmaking stage—which contributes approximately 70% of the CO2 emitted per ton of steel in the dominant blast furnace–basic oxygen furnace (BF–BOF) route—is decisive for decarbonizing the steel industry. In contrast to earlier reviews that describe individual technologies in isolation, this review provides a structured, cross-technology synthesis: the main routes are classified into short-/medium-term low-carbon blast furnace technologies (hydrogen-rich carbon-recycling oxygen blast furnace, hydrogen-rich injection, biomass char injection and ultimate energy-efficiency measures) and medium-/long-term non-blast furnace technologies (hydrogen-based shaft furnace direct reduction, smelting reduction, rotary hearth furnace, fluidized-bed reduction and electric smelting reduction) and are then compared on a common set of quantitative indicators—CO2 mitigation, specific energy and hydrogen demand, technology readiness level (TRL) and relative cost. On this basis, emerging hydrogen-based flash ironmaking, developed from the interdisciplinary integration of “iron and steel–non-ferrous metallurgy–hydrogen metallurgy–plasma”, is critically assessed, with a clear separation between laboratory/pilot feasibility and industrial readiness. We conclude that low-carbon blast furnace technologies, owing to low retrofit cost and high maturity, will dominate near-term mitigation, whereas hydrogen-based shaft furnaces and, in the longer term, hydrogen-based flash ironmaking define the pathway toward near-zero-carbon ironmaking—conditional on the availability of green hydrogen and low-carbon electricity and on overcoming key engineering barriers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Materials
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19153163
Primary Topic
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Research Progress on Low-Carbon Ironmaking Technologies for China’s Iron and Steel Industry Under the Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality Goals

R Y Zhang, Haokun Li, Wenwen Liu, Yuanhong Qi
Materials
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
article

Research Progress on Low-Carbon Ironmaking Technologies for China’s Iron and Steel Industry Under the Carbon Peaking and Carbon Neutrality Goals

R Y Zhang, Haokun Li, Wenwen Liu, Yuanhong Qi
article en

Abstract

Under China’s “carbon peaking before 2030 and carbon neutrality before 2060” targets, the low-carbon transformation of the ironmaking stage—which contributes approximately 70% of the CO2 emitted per ton of steel in the dominant blast furnace–basic oxygen furnace (BF–BOF) route—is decisive for decarbonizing the steel industry. In contrast to earlier reviews that describe individual technologies in isolation, this review provides a structured, cross-technology synthesis: the main routes are classified into short-/medium-term low-carbon blast furnace technologies (hydrogen-rich carbon-recycling oxygen blast furnace, hydrogen-rich injection, biomass char injection and ultimate energy-efficiency measures) and medium-/long-term non-blast furnace technologies (hydrogen-based shaft furnace direct reduction, smelting reduction, rotary hearth furnace, fluidized-bed reduction and electric smelting reduction) and are then compared on a common set of quantitative indicators—CO2 mitigation, specific energy and hydrogen demand, technology readiness level (TRL) and relative cost. On this basis, emerging hydrogen-based flash ironmaking, developed from the interdisciplinary integration of “iron and steel–non-ferrous metallurgy–hydrogen metallurgy–plasma”, is critically assessed, with a clear separation between laboratory/pilot feasibility and industrial readiness. We conclude that low-carbon blast furnace technologies, owing to low retrofit cost and high maturity, will dominate near-term mitigation, whereas hydrogen-based shaft furnaces and, in the longer term, hydrogen-based flash ironmaking define the pathway toward near-zero-carbon ironmaking—conditional on the availability of green hydrogen and low-carbon electricity and on overcoming key engineering barriers.

MaterialsVol. 19(15)
Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN), China Iron and Steel Research Institute Group (CN), Taiyuan Iron and Steel Group (China) (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Iron and Steelmaking Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.