Intelligent Cybersecurity Analytics and Predictive Network Process Monitoring Using Relational, Graph-Based, and Streaming Data Systems

In today’s increasingly complicated network environments, effective cybersecurity analytics necessitate scalable data processing systems that can handle massive amounts of diverse traffic data. This article compares relational, graph-based, and streaming data systems for cybersecurity analytics using the CICIDS2017 dataset. We specifically compare a columnar cloud data warehouse (Amazon Redshift) with a graph database (Neo4j) using example analytical queries to investigate trade-offs in query expressiveness, performance, and data modeling flexibility. In addition, we evaluate a real-time data intake pipeline built on Apache Kafka and Apache Cassandra to investigate ingestion throughput and low-latency storage features under simulated streaming workloads. The systems are examined independently to highlight their strengths and weaknesses in batch analytics, relationship-centric analysis, and real-time monitoring. The findings offer practical insights into how alternative data models and processing paradigms impact cybersecurity analytical tasks, as well as recommendations for selecting optimal data systems for network traffic analytics and intrusion detection use cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Eng—Advances in Engineering
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/eng7080363
Primary Topic
Graph Theory and Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intelligent Cybersecurity Analytics and Predictive Network Process Monitoring Using Relational, Graph-Based, and Streaming Data Systems

Vishnu S. Pendyala, Mayank Kapadia
Eng—Advances in Engineering
Graph Theory and Algorithms
article

Intelligent Cybersecurity Analytics and Predictive Network Process Monitoring Using Relational, Graph-Based, and Streaming Data Systems

Vishnu S. Pendyala, Mayank Kapadia
article en

Abstract

In today’s increasingly complicated network environments, effective cybersecurity analytics necessitate scalable data processing systems that can handle massive amounts of diverse traffic data. This article compares relational, graph-based, and streaming data systems for cybersecurity analytics using the CICIDS2017 dataset. We specifically compare a columnar cloud data warehouse (Amazon Redshift) with a graph database (Neo4j) using example analytical queries to investigate trade-offs in query expressiveness, performance, and data modeling flexibility. In addition, we evaluate a real-time data intake pipeline built on Apache Kafka and Apache Cassandra to investigate ingestion throughput and low-latency storage features under simulated streaming workloads. The systems are examined independently to highlight their strengths and weaknesses in batch analytics, relationship-centric analysis, and real-time monitoring. The findings offer practical insights into how alternative data models and processing paradigms impact cybersecurity analytical tasks, as well as recommendations for selecting optimal data systems for network traffic analytics and intrusion detection use cases.

Eng—Advances in EngineeringVol. 7(8)
San Jose State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Graph Theory and Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Intelligent Cybersecurity Analytics and Predictive Network Process Monitoring Using Relational, Graph-Based, and Streaming Data Systems — Vishnu S. Pendyala, Mayank Kapadia · Eng—Advances in Engineering (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS