Association of Histopathologic Characteristics in Diagnostic Prostate Biopsies With Decipher Genomic Classifier Risk Groups

Prostate cancer remains the most frequently diagnosed malignancy in men. While traditional clinicopathologic parameters guide management, genomic classifiers such as the Decipher assay are increasingly used to refine risk stratification. In this study, we evaluated the association between Decipher genomic classifier (GC) (GenomeDx Biosciences, Vancouver, BC, Canada) risk groups and histopathologic features in diagnostic prostate biopsy specimens within a routine clinical setting. We retrospectively reviewed 73 prostatic adenocarcinoma biopsies that underwent Decipher genomic testing, sampled between 2024 and 2025. Decipher risk groups demonstrated a significant association with grade groups (GG) (p=0.03 (χ²=16.6)), with high-risk (HR) cases showing a higher prevalence of higher GG compared to low-risk (LR) cases. Quantitative metrics of tumor burden were also significantly associated with risk groups: the mean positive core ratio (LR: 0.44 versus HR: 0.64; p=0.003) and mean maximum tumor length ratio (LR: 0.47 versus HR: 0.67; p=0.01) were significantly higher in the HR group. Aggressive features such as extraprostatic extension and intraductal carcinoma were identified exclusively in the HR group. No significant differences were observed for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels across groups. In conclusion, histopathologic indicators of tumor aggressiveness and burden in diagnostic prostate biopsies show significant association with Decipher GC risk groups, supporting their complementary role in risk stratification.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.113243
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of Histopathologic Characteristics in Diagnostic Prostate Biopsies With Decipher Genomic Classifier Risk Groups

Atif Usman, Garrison Pease, Selin Kurt, Emily Torres
Cureus
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Association of Histopathologic Characteristics in Diagnostic Prostate Biopsies With Decipher Genomic Classifier Risk Groups

Atif Usman, Garrison Pease, Selin Kurt, Emily Torres
article en

Abstract

Prostate cancer remains the most frequently diagnosed malignancy in men. While traditional clinicopathologic parameters guide management, genomic classifiers such as the Decipher assay are increasingly used to refine risk stratification. In this study, we evaluated the association between Decipher genomic classifier (GC) (GenomeDx Biosciences, Vancouver, BC, Canada) risk groups and histopathologic features in diagnostic prostate biopsy specimens within a routine clinical setting. We retrospectively reviewed 73 prostatic adenocarcinoma biopsies that underwent Decipher genomic testing, sampled between 2024 and 2025. Decipher risk groups demonstrated a significant association with grade groups (GG) (p=0.03 (χ²=16.6)), with high-risk (HR) cases showing a higher prevalence of higher GG compared to low-risk (LR) cases. Quantitative metrics of tumor burden were also significantly associated with risk groups: the mean positive core ratio (LR: 0.44 versus HR: 0.64; p=0.003) and mean maximum tumor length ratio (LR: 0.47 versus HR: 0.67; p=0.01) were significantly higher in the HR group. Aggressive features such as extraprostatic extension and intraductal carcinoma were identified exclusively in the HR group. No significant differences were observed for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels across groups. In conclusion, histopathologic indicators of tumor aggressiveness and burden in diagnostic prostate biopsies show significant association with Decipher GC risk groups, supporting their complementary role in risk stratification.

Cureus
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.