Emerging Nanobiochar –Hydrogel Therapeutic Systems: Redox Modulation, Biointerface Interactions, and Critical Gaps in In Vitro Evaluation

Nanobiochar has attracted increasing attention as a redox-active carbon nanomaterial with potential applications beyond its traditional roles in environmental remediation and adsorption technologies. When integrated into hydrogel matrices, nanobiochar may provide a unique combination of physicochemical and biological functionalities, including reactive oxygen species (ROS) modulation, antimicrobial activity, high adsorption capacity, and localized therapeutic delivery. Such properties are particularly relevant to emerging wound-healing and regenerative medicine applications; however, the biological mechanisms governing the performance of nanobiochar–hydrogel systems remain poorly understood. Because direct studies on nanobiochar–hydrogel therapeutic systems remain scarce, this review integrates evidence from the limited nanobiochar literature together with evidence from studies on conventional biochar, hydrogel biomaterials, and related carbon nanomaterial to critically evaluate emerging biological mechanisms and identify future research priorities. This review combines bibliometric analysis with mechanistic evaluation to assess the potential of nanobiochar–hydrogel systems as therapeutic biomaterials while highlighting critical knowledge gaps limiting their development. Bibliometric findings reveal that research on biochar–hydrogel composites is dominated by environmental remediation, adsorption processes, and material characterization, whereas investigations addressing biological responses and therapeutic functionality remain limited. Building upon these observations, this review examines nanobiochar surface chemistry, electron transfer behavior, and redox-active properties that may influence ROS regulation at biological interfaces. Particular emphasis is placed on biointerface interactions, including protein adsorption, protein corona formation, cellular uptake pathways, and the influence of hydrogel-mediated exposure on biological responses. The review further evaluates potential antimicrobial mechanisms, redox-sensitive signaling pathways, cytocompatibility assessment strategies, and the behavior of nanobiochar-containing systems under physiologically relevant conditions. Current evidence indicates a strong reliance on chemical antioxidant assays and short-term viability measurements, while mechanistic investigations involving intracellular ROS regulation, inflammatory signaling, mitochondrial function, and gene expression responses remain scarce. Collectively, the literature discussed in this article highlights the substantial gap between material development and biological validation and provides a framework for future studies aimed at evaluating the suitability of nanobiochar–hydrogel systems for wound-healing and regenerative applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gels
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/gels12080660
Primary Topic
Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emerging Nanobiochar –Hydrogel Therapeutic Systems: Redox Modulation, Biointerface Interactions, and Critical Gaps in In Vitro Evaluation

Rema M. Amawi, Dali Vilma Francis, Rawan Abusirdaneh, Vidhya Sunil Bhaskarakurup et al.
Gels
Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
article

Emerging Nanobiochar –Hydrogel Therapeutic Systems: Redox Modulation, Biointerface Interactions, and Critical Gaps in In Vitro Evaluation

Rema M. Amawi, Dali Vilma Francis, Rawan Abusirdaneh, Vidhya Sunil Bhaskarakurup, Leena Thomas
article en

Abstract

Nanobiochar has attracted increasing attention as a redox-active carbon nanomaterial with potential applications beyond its traditional roles in environmental remediation and adsorption technologies. When integrated into hydrogel matrices, nanobiochar may provide a unique combination of physicochemical and biological functionalities, including reactive oxygen species (ROS) modulation, antimicrobial activity, high adsorption capacity, and localized therapeutic delivery. Such properties are particularly relevant to emerging wound-healing and regenerative medicine applications; however, the biological mechanisms governing the performance of nanobiochar–hydrogel systems remain poorly understood. Because direct studies on nanobiochar–hydrogel therapeutic systems remain scarce, this review integrates evidence from the limited nanobiochar literature together with evidence from studies on conventional biochar, hydrogel biomaterials, and related carbon nanomaterial to critically evaluate emerging biological mechanisms and identify future research priorities. This review combines bibliometric analysis with mechanistic evaluation to assess the potential of nanobiochar–hydrogel systems as therapeutic biomaterials while highlighting critical knowledge gaps limiting their development. Bibliometric findings reveal that research on biochar–hydrogel composites is dominated by environmental remediation, adsorption processes, and material characterization, whereas investigations addressing biological responses and therapeutic functionality remain limited. Building upon these observations, this review examines nanobiochar surface chemistry, electron transfer behavior, and redox-active properties that may influence ROS regulation at biological interfaces. Particular emphasis is placed on biointerface interactions, including protein adsorption, protein corona formation, cellular uptake pathways, and the influence of hydrogel-mediated exposure on biological responses. The review further evaluates potential antimicrobial mechanisms, redox-sensitive signaling pathways, cytocompatibility assessment strategies, and the behavior of nanobiochar-containing systems under physiologically relevant conditions. Current evidence indicates a strong reliance on chemical antioxidant assays and short-term viability measurements, while mechanistic investigations involving intracellular ROS regulation, inflammatory signaling, mitochondrial function, and gene expression responses remain scarce. Collectively, the literature discussed in this article highlights the substantial gap between material development and biological validation and provides a framework for future studies aimed at evaluating the suitability of nanobiochar–hydrogel systems for wound-healing and regenerative applications.

GelsVol. 12(8)
Rochester Institute of Technology - Dubai (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.