A Practical Auditability Layer for AI Systems: A Lightweight Method for Traceable and Reproducible AI Reasoning

AI systems increasingly operate in regulated environments where decisions must be traceable, reproducible, and auditable. Large language models typically provide outputs without exposing the underlying reasoning, making it difficult to detect drift, inconsistency, or hallucinations. This preprint introduces a lightweight auditability layer that logs reasoning chains without modifying the underlying model. The method uses structured reasoning prompts, reasoning‑chain logging, and cross‑run consistency comparison to detect divergence and ensure stability. It is model‑agnostic, easy to implement, and suitable for enterprise workflows in clinical, financial, legal, and operational domains. Limitations and future extensions are included, such as semantic comparison of reasoning chains, multi‑model validation, and collapse‑vector‑based stability scoring. This work is part of the vW‑KG GL‑4 Continuum and contributes to practical AI safety, transparency, and governance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21517167
Primary Topic
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

A Practical Auditability Layer for AI Systems: A Lightweight Method for Traceable and Reproducible AI Reasoning

Rob Snoek-van Wienen
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
preprint

A Practical Auditability Layer for AI Systems: A Lightweight Method for Traceable and Reproducible AI Reasoning

Rob Snoek-van Wienen
preprint en

Abstract

AI systems increasingly operate in regulated environments where decisions must be traceable, reproducible, and auditable. Large language models typically provide outputs without exposing the underlying reasoning, making it difficult to detect drift, inconsistency, or hallucinations. This preprint introduces a lightweight auditability layer that logs reasoning chains without modifying the underlying model. The method uses structured reasoning prompts, reasoning‑chain logging, and cross‑run consistency comparison to detect divergence and ensure stability. It is model‑agnostic, easy to implement, and suitable for enterprise workflows in clinical, financial, legal, and operational domains. Limitations and future extensions are included, such as semantic comparison of reasoning chains, multi‑model validation, and collapse‑vector‑based stability scoring. This work is part of the vW‑KG GL‑4 Continuum and contributes to practical AI safety, transparency, and governance.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Hewlett-Packard (Netherlands) (NL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.