Deriving injury severity from crash trauma data: RAPEX HARM from AIS 2015 coded injuries

OBJECTIVE: The European Union's Safety Gate Rapid Alert System (RAPEX) notifies authorities of dangerous non-food products and mandates Hazard and Risk Assessment Methodology (HARM) evaluations that consider both acute injury severity and long-term consequences (LTC), defined as health effects persisting beyond the initial injury. The objective of this study is to develop a post-processing method that enables the direct use of Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 2015-coded trauma data to compute RAPEX HARM assessments at the patient level. METHODS: Real-world crash data from the German in-depth Accident Study (GIDAS) database, spanning 1999 to 2024, were analyzed. The AIS 2015 codebook provides two injury metrics per injury: the AIS Code (AIS-CD), which quantifies acute threat to life, and the predicted Functional Capacity Index (pFCI), which assesses long-term incapacitation. To address coding variability and misalignment between the AIS-codebook with clinical diagnoses, the original 6-digit AIS unique identifiers (AIS-IDs), which specify injury type, location, and severity, were aggregated to a more robust level of detail. Subsequently, individual injury severities were summarized at the person level using a conversion based on the three most severe injuries (triples), analogous to the New Injury Severity Score (NISS). The HARM Level (1-4) assigned to each patient reflects the most severe outcome, determined independently from either the AIS-CD or pFCI injury triple conversion. RESULTS: The AIS-CD, representing an acute threat to life, was the primary determinant of lower HARM scores, whereas the LTC metric became increasingly influential at higher HARM severities. At the highest severity level (HARM 4), AIS-CD was the dominant factor in 53% of cases, pFCI (long-term disability metric) in 16%, and both metrics were equally severe in 31% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed post-processing method assigns RAPEX HARM values to patients with AIS 2015-coded injuries by using both acute threats to life (AIS-CD) and long-term consequences information (pFCI), enabling RAPEX evaluations of crash and trauma databases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Traffic Injury Prevention
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2026.2690445
Primary Topic
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deriving injury severity from crash trauma data: RAPEX HARM from AIS 2015 coded injuries

J. Krampe, M. Junge
Traffic Injury Prevention
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
article

Deriving injury severity from crash trauma data: RAPEX HARM from AIS 2015 coded injuries

J. Krampe, M. Junge
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The European Union's Safety Gate Rapid Alert System (RAPEX) notifies authorities of dangerous non-food products and mandates Hazard and Risk Assessment Methodology (HARM) evaluations that consider both acute injury severity and long-term consequences (LTC), defined as health effects persisting beyond the initial injury. The objective of this study is to develop a post-processing method that enables the direct use of Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) 2015-coded trauma data to compute RAPEX HARM assessments at the patient level. METHODS: Real-world crash data from the German in-depth Accident Study (GIDAS) database, spanning 1999 to 2024, were analyzed. The AIS 2015 codebook provides two injury metrics per injury: the AIS Code (AIS-CD), which quantifies acute threat to life, and the predicted Functional Capacity Index (pFCI), which assesses long-term incapacitation. To address coding variability and misalignment between the AIS-codebook with clinical diagnoses, the original 6-digit AIS unique identifiers (AIS-IDs), which specify injury type, location, and severity, were aggregated to a more robust level of detail. Subsequently, individual injury severities were summarized at the person level using a conversion based on the three most severe injuries (triples), analogous to the New Injury Severity Score (NISS). The HARM Level (1-4) assigned to each patient reflects the most severe outcome, determined independently from either the AIS-CD or pFCI injury triple conversion. RESULTS: The AIS-CD, representing an acute threat to life, was the primary determinant of lower HARM scores, whereas the LTC metric became increasingly influential at higher HARM severities. At the highest severity level (HARM 4), AIS-CD was the dominant factor in 53% of cases, pFCI (long-term disability metric) in 16%, and both metrics were equally severe in 31% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed post-processing method assigns RAPEX HARM values to patients with AIS 2015-coded injuries by using both acute threats to life (AIS-CD) and long-term consequences information (pFCI), enabling RAPEX evaluations of crash and trauma databases.

Traffic Injury Prevention
Volkswagen Group (United States) (US), Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.