On the Performance of Phase I Dispersion Control Charts under Machine Learning Imputed Data

ABSTRACT Phase I analysis is essential to understand the variability of the process and determine its stability. Providing Phase II control charts with poor parameters’ estimates leads to a weak performance. In case of incomplete Phase I data, the problem of missing values must be dealt with before estimating the process parameters. Researchers commonly rely on the traditional Mean Substitution (MS) and/or the Stochastic Regression (SRG) imputation methods, whilst the number of studies exploiting machine learning algorithms in the SPC field is rapidly increasing. Accordingly, in this study, we consider two common and powerful machine learning‐based imputation methods; which are the k‐Nearest Neighbors (kNN) and Support Vector Regression (SVR). We compare their effect with the two traditional methods, the MS and the SRG methods, on the performance of the G‐chart designed to monitor the process variability. Our results show that kNN imputation either surpasses the performance of the traditional methods or provides a similar performance. An application of the G‐chart is also illustrated. We recommend the use of the kNN imputation while monitoring the process dispersion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.70336
Primary Topic
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On the Performance of Phase I Dispersion Control Charts under Machine Learning Imputed Data

Mahmoud A. Mahmoud, Nesma A. Saleh, Dina A. Desoki, Abdel Nasser Saad
Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
article

On the Performance of Phase I Dispersion Control Charts under Machine Learning Imputed Data

Mahmoud A. Mahmoud, Nesma A. Saleh, Dina A. Desoki, Abdel Nasser Saad
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Phase I analysis is essential to understand the variability of the process and determine its stability. Providing Phase II control charts with poor parameters’ estimates leads to a weak performance. In case of incomplete Phase I data, the problem of missing values must be dealt with before estimating the process parameters. Researchers commonly rely on the traditional Mean Substitution (MS) and/or the Stochastic Regression (SRG) imputation methods, whilst the number of studies exploiting machine learning algorithms in the SPC field is rapidly increasing. Accordingly, in this study, we consider two common and powerful machine learning‐based imputation methods; which are the k‐Nearest Neighbors (kNN) and Support Vector Regression (SVR). We compare their effect with the two traditional methods, the MS and the SRG methods, on the performance of the G‐chart designed to monitor the process variability. Our results show that kNN imputation either surpasses the performance of the traditional methods or provides a similar performance. An application of the G‐chart is also illustrated. We recommend the use of the kNN imputation while monitoring the process dispersion.

Quality and Reliability Engineering International
Cairo University (EG)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Advanced Statistical Process Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

On the Performance of Phase I Dispersion Control Charts under Machine Learning Imputed Data — Mahmoud A. Mahmoud, Nesma A. Saleh, et al. · Quality and Reliability Engineering International (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS