A Communicative–Linguistic Analysis of Typically Developing Children Aged 12- to 37-Month-Old Using the Dynamic Communication Evaluation Coding Scheme: Data Presentation and Comparison Across Age Groups

This study collected cross-sectional data on the social, communicative, pragmatic, and linguistic abilities of typically developing 12- to 37-month-old children. A preliminary literature review indicated that no observational tool with robust psychometric properties is currently available to assess communication and language in this age range. To address this gap, a coding scheme was employed on data from 91 typically developing Italian children (all with expressive vocabulary above the 10th percentile), who were divided into 3 groups (G1:12–17 months; G2:18–23 months; G3:24–37 months). Videotaped parent–child play interactions were analyzed to assess communicative frequency, gaze-related communicative prerequisites, communicative roles, communicative functions, and language complexity. Significant group differences and correlations with age and vocabulary were identified, including a reduction in assertiveness and requesting functions and an increase in responsiveness and declarative functions. The developmental progression of linguistic complexity is consistent with the previous literature, supporting the validity of the study and offering implications for both clinical practice and research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
First Language
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01427237261462308
Primary Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Communicative–Linguistic Analysis of Typically Developing Children Aged 12- to 37-Month-Old Using the Dynamic Communication Evaluation Coding Scheme: Data Presentation and Comparison Across Age Groups

Luca Andreoli, Elisa Granocchio, Santina Magazù, Laura Zampini et al.
First Language
Language Development and Disorders
article

A Communicative–Linguistic Analysis of Typically Developing Children Aged 12- to 37-Month-Old Using the Dynamic Communication Evaluation Coding Scheme: Data Presentation and Comparison Across Age Groups

Luca Andreoli, Elisa Granocchio, Santina Magazù, Laura Zampini, Gloria Airaghi, Stefania Gazzola, B. Molteni, Marinella De Salvatore, Daniela Sarti, Claudia Maggiulli, Martina Paini
article en

Abstract

This study collected cross-sectional data on the social, communicative, pragmatic, and linguistic abilities of typically developing 12- to 37-month-old children. A preliminary literature review indicated that no observational tool with robust psychometric properties is currently available to assess communication and language in this age range. To address this gap, a coding scheme was employed on data from 91 typically developing Italian children (all with expressive vocabulary above the 10th percentile), who were divided into 3 groups (G1:12–17 months; G2:18–23 months; G3:24–37 months). Videotaped parent–child play interactions were analyzed to assess communicative frequency, gaze-related communicative prerequisites, communicative roles, communicative functions, and language complexity. Significant group differences and correlations with age and vocabulary were identified, including a reduction in assertiveness and requesting functions and an increase in responsiveness and declarative functions. The developmental progression of linguistic complexity is consistent with the previous literature, supporting the validity of the study and offering implications for both clinical practice and research.

First Language
Istituto Universitario di Studi Superiori di Pavia (IT), Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (IT), University of Milano-Bicocca (IT), University of Genoa (IT)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Language Development and Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.