Occlusion in Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Restorations: Biological Basis, Biomechanical Considerations and Clinical Recommendations

Background/Objectives: The management of occlusion in implant-supported fixed partial restorations (ISFPRs) remains a controversial topic because of the limited availa-bility of high-level clinical evidence and the biomechanical differences between natural teeth and dental implants. The absence of the periodontal ligament and the altered biomechanics of implants have led to specific occlusal concepts. This narrative review provides an up-to-date overview of the biological basis of implant occlusion, the role of occlusal overload, occlusal concepts, prosthetic materials, and long-term maintenance strategies for ISFPRs. Methods: A narrative review was conducted through an electronic search of the PubMed/MEDLINE database covering the period from 1 March 2001 to 1 March 2026. Clinical studies, review articles, in vitro studies, and finite element analyses addressing occlusal management in ISFPRs were selected and synthesized according to their clinical relevance. Results: The available literature indicates that evidence sup-porting specific occlusal protocols for ISFPRs remains limited and heterogeneous. Con-temporary occlusal concepts emphasize minimizing non-axial loading, optimizing oc-clusal morphology, controlling cantilever extension, and considering patient-specific factors such as bruxism. Monolithic zirconia represents one of the most suitable restor-ative options because of its favorable mechanical performance and reduced technical complications. Long-term maintenance and periodic occlusal reassessment remain es-sential, as occlusal relationships continue to change throughout life. Conclusions: Alt-hough numerous occlusal concepts have been proposed, high-level evidence remains limited, highlighting the need for future prospective studies aimed at establishing evi-dence-based occlusal protocols for ISFPRs. Clinicians should adopt individualized oc-clusal strategies guided by sound biomechanical principles while acknowledging the current limitations of the available evidence.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Prosthesis
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis8090093
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Occlusion in Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Restorations: Biological Basis, Biomechanical Considerations and Clinical Recommendations

Riccardo Scaini, Andrea Berzaghi, Tiziano Testori, Sergio Bortolini
Prosthesis
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

Occlusion in Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Restorations: Biological Basis, Biomechanical Considerations and Clinical Recommendations

Riccardo Scaini, Andrea Berzaghi, Tiziano Testori, Sergio Bortolini
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The management of occlusion in implant-supported fixed partial restorations (ISFPRs) remains a controversial topic because of the limited availa-bility of high-level clinical evidence and the biomechanical differences between natural teeth and dental implants. The absence of the periodontal ligament and the altered biomechanics of implants have led to specific occlusal concepts. This narrative review provides an up-to-date overview of the biological basis of implant occlusion, the role of occlusal overload, occlusal concepts, prosthetic materials, and long-term maintenance strategies for ISFPRs. Methods: A narrative review was conducted through an electronic search of the PubMed/MEDLINE database covering the period from 1 March 2001 to 1 March 2026. Clinical studies, review articles, in vitro studies, and finite element analyses addressing occlusal management in ISFPRs were selected and synthesized according to their clinical relevance. Results: The available literature indicates that evidence sup-porting specific occlusal protocols for ISFPRs remains limited and heterogeneous. Con-temporary occlusal concepts emphasize minimizing non-axial loading, optimizing oc-clusal morphology, controlling cantilever extension, and considering patient-specific factors such as bruxism. Monolithic zirconia represents one of the most suitable restor-ative options because of its favorable mechanical performance and reduced technical complications. Long-term maintenance and periodic occlusal reassessment remain es-sential, as occlusal relationships continue to change throughout life. Conclusions: Alt-hough numerous occlusal concepts have been proposed, high-level evidence remains limited, highlighting the need for future prospective studies aimed at establishing evi-dence-based occlusal protocols for ISFPRs. Clinicians should adopt individualized oc-clusal strategies guided by sound biomechanical principles while acknowledging the current limitations of the available evidence.

ProsthesisVol. 8(9)
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Occlusion in Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Restorations: Biological Basis, Biomechanical Considerations and Clinical Recommendations — Riccardo Scaini, Andrea Berzaghi, et al. · Prosthesis (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS