Negotiating Cultural Hegemony in Translation: An Integrated Narrative-and-Strategy Analysis of Flowers in the Mirror

HRMARS - The translation of culturally embedded terms in Li Jiuzhen’s Flowers in the Mirror presents a critical site for negotiating cultural hegemony. This study examines how cultural-hegemonic narratives, encoded in specific lexicons, are transferred in English translation and to what ideological effect. It develops an integrated framework utilizing Mona Baker’s narrative theory to categorize these words and Javier Franco Aixelá’s taxonomy of translation strategies to analyze their micro-level treatment. Analysis reveals a tendency for strategies like naturalization to dilute source-cultural narratives, whereas selective foreignization preserves subversive alterity. The study concludes that translational choices are acts of ideological negotiation, and proposes this narrative-strategy model as a replicable tool for critically examining power dynamics in literary translation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v16-i7/28660
Primary Topic
Translation Studies and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Negotiating Cultural Hegemony in Translation: An Integrated Narrative-and-Strategy Analysis of Flowers in the Mirror

Sun Yutian, Anis Shahirah Abdul Sukur
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
Translation Studies and Practices
article

Negotiating Cultural Hegemony in Translation: An Integrated Narrative-and-Strategy Analysis of Flowers in the Mirror

Sun Yutian, Anis Shahirah Abdul Sukur
article en

Abstract

HRMARS - The translation of culturally embedded terms in Li Jiuzhen’s Flowers in the Mirror presents a critical site for negotiating cultural hegemony. This study examines how cultural-hegemonic narratives, encoded in specific lexicons, are transferred in English translation and to what ideological effect. It develops an integrated framework utilizing Mona Baker’s narrative theory to categorize these words and Javier Franco Aixelá’s taxonomy of translation strategies to analyze their micro-level treatment. Analysis reveals a tendency for strategies like naturalization to dilute source-cultural narratives, whereas selective foreignization preserves subversive alterity. The study concludes that translational choices are acts of ideological negotiation, and proposes this narrative-strategy model as a replicable tool for critically examining power dynamics in literary translation.

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social SciencesVol. 16(7)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Translation Studies and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.