Comparison of dexmedetomidine and droperidol-fentanyl for asleep-awake-asleep techniques in awake craniotomy anesthesia: a randomized controlled study

Abstract Background In this study, we aimed to compare dexmedetomidine with droperidol-fentanyl during the intraoperative awakening phase of awake craniotomy (AC), focusing on wake-up time. Methods We conducted a single-center randomized controlled trial in China from January 2018 to December 2018. Patients aged 36–60 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I–II, scheduled for brain glioma resection, were screened for eligibility; 61 were randomized, and 60 were included in the final analysis. The patients were randomized to either the dexmedetomidine group (intravenous loading dose of dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg·kg − 1 after discontinuation of propofol and remifentanil, followed by a maintenance infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.3–0.5 µg·kg − 1 ·h − 1 ) or the droperidol-fentanyl group (intravenous loading doses of fentanyl 2 µg·kg − 1 and droperidol 5 mg after discontinuation of propofol and remifentanil, followed by continuous maintenance infusions of fentanyl 2 µg·kg − 1 ·h − 1 and droperidol 0.1 mg·kg − 1 ·h − 1 ). A wake-up assessment was performed during maintenance of the assigned study regimen. The primary outcome measure was wake-up time. Secondary outcomes included the Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scale, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), eloquent brain area mapping status, vital signs, and adverse events. Results Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. Compared with the droperidol-fentanyl group, the dexmedetomidine group had lower mean arterial pressure at T4-T7, lower heart rate at T1-T4 and T7, and a shorter wake-up time, with a between-group difference of 3.5 min (95% CI, 1.95 to 5.05; P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were detected in OAA/S scores at wake-up (T2), NRS scores, eloquent area mapping status, or adverse events between the groups. Conclusion No statistically significant differences were detected in OAA/S scores at wake-up or intraoperative brain mapping performance between the two groups. The dexmedetomidine regimen was associated with a shorter measured wake-up time. Trial registration The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800014329) was retrospectively registered on 6 January 2018.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Anesthesiology
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-026-04117-y
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of dexmedetomidine and droperidol-fentanyl for asleep-awake-asleep techniques in awake craniotomy anesthesia: a randomized controlled study

Jianchun Fei, Jianmin Wu, dongdong qu, Yaqiu Guo et al.
BMC Anesthesiology
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

Comparison of dexmedetomidine and droperidol-fentanyl for asleep-awake-asleep techniques in awake craniotomy anesthesia: a randomized controlled study

Jianchun Fei, Jianmin Wu, dongdong qu, Yaqiu Guo, Zhigang Wang, Yi-Xiang Wang, Yiyan Ren, Dejie Liu, Xiaomei Yang
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background In this study, we aimed to compare dexmedetomidine with droperidol-fentanyl during the intraoperative awakening phase of awake craniotomy (AC), focusing on wake-up time. Methods We conducted a single-center randomized controlled trial in China from January 2018 to December 2018. Patients aged 36–60 years, with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I–II, scheduled for brain glioma resection, were screened for eligibility; 61 were randomized, and 60 were included in the final analysis. The patients were randomized to either the dexmedetomidine group (intravenous loading dose of dexmedetomidine 0.5 µg·kg − 1 after discontinuation of propofol and remifentanil, followed by a maintenance infusion of dexmedetomidine 0.3–0.5 µg·kg − 1 ·h − 1 ) or the droperidol-fentanyl group (intravenous loading doses of fentanyl 2 µg·kg − 1 and droperidol 5 mg after discontinuation of propofol and remifentanil, followed by continuous maintenance infusions of fentanyl 2 µg·kg − 1 ·h − 1 and droperidol 0.1 mg·kg − 1 ·h − 1 ). A wake-up assessment was performed during maintenance of the assigned study regimen. The primary outcome measure was wake-up time. Secondary outcomes included the Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scale, Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), eloquent brain area mapping status, vital signs, and adverse events. Results Baseline characteristics were comparable between the groups. Compared with the droperidol-fentanyl group, the dexmedetomidine group had lower mean arterial pressure at T4-T7, lower heart rate at T1-T4 and T7, and a shorter wake-up time, with a between-group difference of 3.5 min (95% CI, 1.95 to 5.05; P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were detected in OAA/S scores at wake-up (T2), NRS scores, eloquent area mapping status, or adverse events between the groups. Conclusion No statistically significant differences were detected in OAA/S scores at wake-up or intraoperative brain mapping performance between the two groups. The dexmedetomidine regimen was associated with a shorter measured wake-up time. Trial registration The Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800014329) was retrospectively registered on 6 January 2018.

BMC Anesthesiology
Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Shandong University (CN), Jinan Maternity And Care Hospital (CN), Shandong Provincial QianFoShan Hospital (CN), Shandong Maternal and Child Health Hospital (CN), Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN), Qilu Hospital of Shandong University (CN), Shandong First Medical University (CN)
China Scholarship Council
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.