Aging in place preferences of older adults with cognitive impairment and informal caregivers: A qualitative analysis of a discrete choice experiment

BackgroundThe Netherlands spends more on long-term care than any other country. In 2015, reforms aimed to promote aging in place (AIP) but have been associated with increased crisis-related hospitalizations, rising caregiver burden, and a need for safer AIP strategies. Little is known about how people with dementia and informal caregivers prioritize AIP care and how their preferences differ.ObjectiveTo identify and compare AIP care preferences of people with dementia and informal caregivers, highlighting shared and individual priorities.MethodsWe used a think-aloud protocol within a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Participants were recruited from outpatient clinics, daycare centers, and cultural organizations. To ensure inclusivity, a formal dementia diagnosis was not required given documented diagnostic delays, particularly in migrant communities. Forty participants (20 care recipients, 20 informal caregivers) completed choice tasks comparing care packages. The DCE comprised three rounds: an online survey for informal caregivers, interviews with the person with dementia, and a dyadic round. Think-aloud responses illuminated decision-making; audio was transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed.ResultsFive themes shaped preferences: (1) burden of in-home care and care planning, (2) role of case managers, (3) accessibility and inclusivity of social activities, (4) trust in healthcare providers, and (5) reimbursements for home adaptations. Care recipients prioritized in-home care and social activities; caregivers emphasized case management. Both valued emotional support and full reimbursements for home adaptations.ConclusionsTailoring AIP strategies to the distinct needs of both groups is essential and can support more equitable, effective AIP models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877261469138
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Aging in place preferences of older adults with cognitive impairment and informal caregivers: A qualitative analysis of a discrete choice experiment

Majon Muller, Thomas Engelsma, Isabelle Vullings, F J A Van Deudekom et al.
Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Aging in place preferences of older adults with cognitive impairment and informal caregivers: A qualitative analysis of a discrete choice experiment

Majon Muller, Thomas Engelsma, Isabelle Vullings, F J A Van Deudekom, Özgül Uysal‐Bozkir, David Neal, Janet MacNeil Vroomen, Luis I. Pilli, Soukaina El Jaouhari, Bachar Farousi, Caroline Geetan
article en

Abstract

BackgroundThe Netherlands spends more on long-term care than any other country. In 2015, reforms aimed to promote aging in place (AIP) but have been associated with increased crisis-related hospitalizations, rising caregiver burden, and a need for safer AIP strategies. Little is known about how people with dementia and informal caregivers prioritize AIP care and how their preferences differ.ObjectiveTo identify and compare AIP care preferences of people with dementia and informal caregivers, highlighting shared and individual priorities.MethodsWe used a think-aloud protocol within a discrete choice experiment (DCE). Participants were recruited from outpatient clinics, daycare centers, and cultural organizations. To ensure inclusivity, a formal dementia diagnosis was not required given documented diagnostic delays, particularly in migrant communities. Forty participants (20 care recipients, 20 informal caregivers) completed choice tasks comparing care packages. The DCE comprised three rounds: an online survey for informal caregivers, interviews with the person with dementia, and a dyadic round. Think-aloud responses illuminated decision-making; audio was transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed.ResultsFive themes shaped preferences: (1) burden of in-home care and care planning, (2) role of case managers, (3) accessibility and inclusivity of social activities, (4) trust in healthcare providers, and (5) reimbursements for home adaptations. Care recipients prioritized in-home care and social activities; caregivers emphasized case management. Both valued emotional support and full reimbursements for home adaptations.ConclusionsTailoring AIP strategies to the distinct needs of both groups is essential and can support more equitable, effective AIP models.

Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
Public Health Service of Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Olin Corporation (United States) (US), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Alzheimer Nederland
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.