Unveiling argumentative communities through ad-populum argumentation schemes
This article introduces a method for detecting argumentative communities in semi-structured debates, which are supported by ad-populum argumentation schemes, as proposed by Walton. In these communities, opinions are characterized by their level of cohesion and the argumentative groups involved. In this context, we present a semi-structured argumentation formalism for analyzing social media debates and demonstrate how large language models can assist in instantiating the proposed formalism. We use conceptualizations, similarity and valued-based argumentation frameworks to assess argument cohesion and strength. Additionally, we model discursive interactions to analyze how stances influence one another and classify argumentative communities based on popular opinion argumentation schemes. We show that these communities can be modeled using such schemes, relying on public perception and consensus.
Authors
- Maximiliano Celmo David Budán (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9900-6511)
- Gerardo I. Simari (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3185-4992)
- María Vanina Martínez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2819-4735)
- Paola D. Budán (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7688-6181)
- Maximiliano Javier Debórtoli
Institutions
- National University of Santiago del Estero (AR)
- Centro Científico Tecnológico - San Juan (AR)
- Artificial Intelligence Research Institute (ES)
- Universidad Nacional del Sur (AR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Argument & Computation
- Published
- 2026-07-23
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/19462174261466579
- Primary Topic
- Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
- Universidad Nacional del Sur
- Universidad Nacional de Santiago del Estero
- Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica
- Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
- Agencia Estatal de Investigación