Female-Inclusive Selective Versus Universal Neonatal Hip Ultrasonography Screening for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of universal versus female-inclusive selective ultrasonography screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in a neonatal population. Methods: This prospective cohort study evaluated two consecutive screening strategies at a single institution: a universal ultrasonography program (2019–2020; n = 354) and a selective program (2024–2025; n = 290). The selective protocol included all female neonates, breech presentation, positive family history, or abnormal clinical findings. All examinations were performed by the same operator using the Graf method. The primary outcome was detection of dysplastic hips; secondary outcomes included immature hip distribution, subgroup differences, and screening efficiency. Results: DDH detection rates were identical between cohorts (1.7%). In the universal cohort, six infants had dysplastic hips; in the selective cohort, five infants were affected, all females. Among these, 40% had no major risk factors. The proportions of mature and immature hips were comparable between cohorts. Screening efficiency was similar (number needed to screen: 59 vs. 58), despite a substantially reduced number of scans in the selective program. Conclusions: A selective screening program that includes all female neonates achieved DDH detection rates comparable to universal screening while significantly reducing imaging volume. As all dysplastic cases occurred in girls, this female-inclusive approach captured the highest-risk demographic without relying solely on traditional risk factors. Incorporating sex-based eligibility into selective screening may provide a safe and efficient framework for DDH screening programs in diverse clinical settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Children
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/children13091195
Primary Topic
Hip disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Female-Inclusive Selective Versus Universal Neonatal Hip Ultrasonography Screening for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Sridhar Kalyanasundaram, Nina Đorđević
Children
Hip disorders and treatments
article

Female-Inclusive Selective Versus Universal Neonatal Hip Ultrasonography Screening for Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Sridhar Kalyanasundaram, Nina Đorđević
article en

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of universal versus female-inclusive selective ultrasonography screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) in a neonatal population. Methods: This prospective cohort study evaluated two consecutive screening strategies at a single institution: a universal ultrasonography program (2019–2020; n = 354) and a selective program (2024–2025; n = 290). The selective protocol included all female neonates, breech presentation, positive family history, or abnormal clinical findings. All examinations were performed by the same operator using the Graf method. The primary outcome was detection of dysplastic hips; secondary outcomes included immature hip distribution, subgroup differences, and screening efficiency. Results: DDH detection rates were identical between cohorts (1.7%). In the universal cohort, six infants had dysplastic hips; in the selective cohort, five infants were affected, all females. Among these, 40% had no major risk factors. The proportions of mature and immature hips were comparable between cohorts. Screening efficiency was similar (number needed to screen: 59 vs. 58), despite a substantially reduced number of scans in the selective program. Conclusions: A selective screening program that includes all female neonates achieved DDH detection rates comparable to universal screening while significantly reducing imaging volume. As all dysplastic cases occurred in girls, this female-inclusive approach captured the highest-risk demographic without relying solely on traditional risk factors. Incorporating sex-based eligibility into selective screening may provide a safe and efficient framework for DDH screening programs in diverse clinical settings.

ChildrenVol. 13(9)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Hip disorders and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.