Probabilistic environmental risk assessment of non-dissolvable nanomaterials (TiO2, CNTs, graphene-based materials, polystyrene nanoplastics) in the terrestrial ecosystem

The accumulation of engineered nanomaterials and nanoplastics in soils, especially sludge-treated soils, raises concerns regarding their potential environmental hazard and risks. This work applies probabilistic environmental risk assessment based on probabilistic species sensitivity distributions (pSSD) and published data from exposure models to derive risk characterization ratios (RCR) for four non-dissolvable nanomaterials: TiO2, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), graphene-based materials (GBMs), and polystyrene nanoplastics (PS-nanoplastics). Median predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) values were found to be 36, 1.5, 56, and 0.5 mg.kg-1, for TiO2, CNTs, GBMs and PS-nanoplastics, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the effects of nanomaterials on plants versus invertebrates, or on monocotyledonous versus dicotyledonous plants. Form-specific comparisons also showed no statistical difference among the different nanomaterial forms (TiO2: P25 vs. anatase vs. rutile; CNTs: multi-walled CNTs vs. single-walled CNTs; GBMs: graphene vs. graphene oxide vs. reduce graphene oxide). At currently predicted environmental concentrations in European soils, none of the materials exhibits an environmental risk, except for TiO2-NPs in sludge-treated soils, where 66% of the simulations resulted in a RCR higher than 1 (median RCR = 1.38). However, a projected increase in environmental concentrations over time can result in larger potential risks in the future. This work also highlights the limitations of the current state of the art in terms of the availability of environmentally relevant ecotoxicity data in soils and of realistic predicted environmental concentrations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/etojnl/vgag205
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Probabilistic environmental risk assessment of non-dissolvable nanomaterials (TiO2, CNTs, graphene-based materials, polystyrene nanoplastics) in the terrestrial ecosystem

Merve Tunalı, Camille Larue, Bernd Nowack, Abderrahmane Nabgui
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
article

Probabilistic environmental risk assessment of non-dissolvable nanomaterials (TiO2, CNTs, graphene-based materials, polystyrene nanoplastics) in the terrestrial ecosystem

Merve Tunalı, Camille Larue, Bernd Nowack, Abderrahmane Nabgui
article en

Abstract

The accumulation of engineered nanomaterials and nanoplastics in soils, especially sludge-treated soils, raises concerns regarding their potential environmental hazard and risks. This work applies probabilistic environmental risk assessment based on probabilistic species sensitivity distributions (pSSD) and published data from exposure models to derive risk characterization ratios (RCR) for four non-dissolvable nanomaterials: TiO2, carbon nanotubes (CNTs), graphene-based materials (GBMs), and polystyrene nanoplastics (PS-nanoplastics). Median predicted no-effect concentration (PNEC) values were found to be 36, 1.5, 56, and 0.5 mg.kg-1, for TiO2, CNTs, GBMs and PS-nanoplastics, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found between the effects of nanomaterials on plants versus invertebrates, or on monocotyledonous versus dicotyledonous plants. Form-specific comparisons also showed no statistical difference among the different nanomaterial forms (TiO2: P25 vs. anatase vs. rutile; CNTs: multi-walled CNTs vs. single-walled CNTs; GBMs: graphene vs. graphene oxide vs. reduce graphene oxide). At currently predicted environmental concentrations in European soils, none of the materials exhibits an environmental risk, except for TiO2-NPs in sludge-treated soils, where 66% of the simulations resulted in a RCR higher than 1 (median RCR = 1.38). However, a projected increase in environmental concentrations over time can result in larger potential risks in the future. This work also highlights the limitations of the current state of the art in terms of the availability of environmentally relevant ecotoxicity data in soils and of realistic predicted environmental concentrations.

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (CH)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.