Comparative Accuracy Assessment of two Low-Cost Devices for Underwater Structure-from-Motion 3D Reconstruction

Abstract. The accurate three-dimensional documentation of underwater environments is critical for infrastructure integrity assessments and archaeological studies, yet it often relies on costly equipment. Advances in low-cost Structure-from-Motion techniques provide accessible alternatives to conventional methods, enabling detailed reconstructions using consumer-grade devices. This study evaluates and compares the 3D reconstruction accuracy of two low-cost imaging systems, GoPro HERO13 and Huawei P30, in underwater and dry conditions, using three test objects with varying surface characteristics. High-precision reference models were generated via an ATOS Triple Scan system to quantify absolute accuracy. Results highlight significant performance differences between the cameras in dry conditions, with the GoPro showing improved reliability in underwater conditions, albeit facing challenges with lighting and low contrast environments. However, the Huawei P30 offered superior image resolution but suffered from usability issues in aquatic settings. Overall, dry condition scans yielded higher-quality point clouds, while underwater reconstructions were affected by environmental factors such as reflections, contrast, and lighting limitations. These findings provide practical insights into optimizing workflows for low-budget underwater photogrammetry and suggest potential improvements, including enhanced lighting setups and alternative imaging devices for future studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlix-b2-2026-979-2026
Primary Topic
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Accuracy Assessment of two Low-Cost Devices for Underwater Structure-from-Motion 3D Reconstruction

Ferdinand Maiwald, Lukas Quirin, Gunnar Lelle-Neumann
˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
article

Comparative Accuracy Assessment of two Low-Cost Devices for Underwater Structure-from-Motion 3D Reconstruction

Ferdinand Maiwald, Lukas Quirin, Gunnar Lelle-Neumann
article en

Abstract

Abstract. The accurate three-dimensional documentation of underwater environments is critical for infrastructure integrity assessments and archaeological studies, yet it often relies on costly equipment. Advances in low-cost Structure-from-Motion techniques provide accessible alternatives to conventional methods, enabling detailed reconstructions using consumer-grade devices. This study evaluates and compares the 3D reconstruction accuracy of two low-cost imaging systems, GoPro HERO13 and Huawei P30, in underwater and dry conditions, using three test objects with varying surface characteristics. High-precision reference models were generated via an ATOS Triple Scan system to quantify absolute accuracy. Results highlight significant performance differences between the cameras in dry conditions, with the GoPro showing improved reliability in underwater conditions, albeit facing challenges with lighting and low contrast environments. However, the Huawei P30 offered superior image resolution but suffered from usability issues in aquatic settings. Overall, dry condition scans yielded higher-quality point clouds, while underwater reconstructions were affected by environmental factors such as reflections, contrast, and lighting limitations. These findings provide practical insights into optimizing workflows for low-budget underwater photogrammetry and suggest potential improvements, including enhanced lighting setups and alternative imaging devices for future studies.

˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciencesVol. XLIX-B2-2026
Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative Accuracy Assessment of two Low-Cost Devices for Underwater Structure-from-Motion 3D Reconstruction — Ferdinand Maiwald, Lukas Quirin, et al. · ˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS