“What Patients Want”: a qualitative study of expectations and ideal clinical encounters in obesity consultations

BACKGROUND: Although obesity is increasingly recognized as a chronic, relapsing disease, clinical consultations remain inconsistently delivered, often perceived by patients as generic, stigmatizing, and insufficiently person-centered. While dissatisfaction with weight-related care is well documented, limited research has systematically examined how patients themselves define the core features of an effective obesity consultation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a patient-informed framework for clinical obesity consultations by exploring the expectations and experiences of individuals with lived experience of obesity. METHODS: with at least one obesity-related complication) who had received treatment for obesity were recruited via purposive sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via Zoom, transcribed, anonymized, and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Coding was inductive and organized using MAXQDA. RESULTS: Participants articulated a coherent and detailed model of the ideal clinical encounter, extending beyond previously reported dissatisfaction. Five key themes were identified: (1) the need for consent-based and context-sensitive initiation of weight discussions; (2) the rejection of moralizing or reductive language in favor of medically grounded and neutral communication; (3) recognition of obesity as heterogeneous, multifactorial disease requiring individualized assessment; (4) expectations for clear, evidence-based information on treatment options and likely outcomes; and (5) a strong preference for ongoing, relationship-based support rather than episodic advice. Patients revealed that unmet informational and relational needs, especially regarding clinical competence, emotional sensitivity, and collaborative treatment planning, were primary barriers to trust and engagement. CONCLUSION: This study advances current understanding by proposing a patient-defined model for obesity consultations, with implications for improving clinical communication, shared decision-making, and continuity of care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Obesity
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-026-02170-8
Primary Topic
Obesity and Health Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“What Patients Want”: a qualitative study of expectations and ideal clinical encounters in obesity consultations

Werd Al‐Najim, Carel Wynand le Roux, Francisca Contreras, Tak Ying Louise Ko
International Journal of Obesity
Obesity and Health Practices
article

“What Patients Want”: a qualitative study of expectations and ideal clinical encounters in obesity consultations

Werd Al‐Najim, Carel Wynand le Roux, Francisca Contreras, Tak Ying Louise Ko
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although obesity is increasingly recognized as a chronic, relapsing disease, clinical consultations remain inconsistently delivered, often perceived by patients as generic, stigmatizing, and insufficiently person-centered. While dissatisfaction with weight-related care is well documented, limited research has systematically examined how patients themselves define the core features of an effective obesity consultation. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a patient-informed framework for clinical obesity consultations by exploring the expectations and experiences of individuals with lived experience of obesity. METHODS: with at least one obesity-related complication) who had received treatment for obesity were recruited via purposive sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted via Zoom, transcribed, anonymized, and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Coding was inductive and organized using MAXQDA. RESULTS: Participants articulated a coherent and detailed model of the ideal clinical encounter, extending beyond previously reported dissatisfaction. Five key themes were identified: (1) the need for consent-based and context-sensitive initiation of weight discussions; (2) the rejection of moralizing or reductive language in favor of medically grounded and neutral communication; (3) recognition of obesity as heterogeneous, multifactorial disease requiring individualized assessment; (4) expectations for clear, evidence-based information on treatment options and likely outcomes; and (5) a strong preference for ongoing, relationship-based support rather than episodic advice. Patients revealed that unmet informational and relational needs, especially regarding clinical competence, emotional sensitivity, and collaborative treatment planning, were primary barriers to trust and engagement. CONCLUSION: This study advances current understanding by proposing a patient-defined model for obesity consultations, with implications for improving clinical communication, shared decision-making, and continuity of care.

International Journal of Obesity
University College Dublin (IE), University of Ulster (GB)
European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations, Irish Research eLibrary, European Commission
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Obesity and Health Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.