Oscillometry in Chronic Respiratory Diseases: From Standardization to Clinical Adoption

Objective: Oscillometry is a lung function technique that has gained increasing interest because of its sensitivity to small airway dysfunction. Despite growing attention, important challenges still limit widespread clinical adoption. The current study aims to advance in Oscillometry analysis and reporting to improve repeatability, interpretability, and clinical applicability. Methods: Oscillometry, forced spirometry, and symptoms were measured at three time points, over a median follow-up of 602 days, in 170 patients with COPD (n=89, 52%), asthma (n=59, 35%), and bronchiectasis (n=22, 13%). We investigated: (1) intra-breath analysis; (2) several modelling strategies to derive a single oscillometry score for routine clinical interpretation; and (3) intra-individual variability. Outcomes were evaluated across three clinical scenarios: bronchodilator response, longitudinal follow-up, and exacerbations. Results: Intra-breath differences between inspiratory and expiratory phases (ΔX5 and ΔAX) reflected respiratory hysteresis but had poor repeatability (daily CoV: 200% and 70%, respectively). Resistance-related variables (R5, R5–20) showed lower sensitivity than reactance-related indices (AX, X5, Fres). An AX-based calibrated oscillometry score (AX-OS) provided the best index among the candidate models evaluated. AX-OS had higher repeatability (CoV 19%) than conventional oscillometry variables, and good clinical responsiveness across the three clinical scenarios assessed. Moreover, AX-OS showed potential for contributing to enhanced community-managed exacerbations through a hybrid care intervention. Conclusions: The findings support: (1) well-defined strategies to reduce intra-session variability, particularly through optimization of AX-derived measures; and (2) simplified clinical reporting approaches. AX-OS may improve interpretability and longitudinal assessment; however, independent validation in larger multicentre cohorts is needed before routine clinical applicability. Trial registration: NCT06421402. Keywords: forced oscillation technique; small airway; COPD; asthma; repeatability; biomarkers; respiratory mechanics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21507624
Primary Topic
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Type
preprint

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Oscillometry in Chronic Respiratory Diseases: From Standardization to Clinical Adoption

Alba Gómez-López, Emili Vela, Néstor Soler, Ebymar Arismendi et al.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
preprint

Oscillometry in Chronic Respiratory Diseases: From Standardization to Clinical Adoption

Alba Gómez-López, Emili Vela, Néstor Soler, Ebymar Arismendi, Josep Roca, Isaac Cano, Ramón Farré, José Fermoso, Jordi Piera-Jiménez, Rubèn González, Núria Sánchez-Ruano, Sandra Rodríguez-Sufuentes, Marina Paredes, Sorribes Marta, Jin-Seok You
preprint en

Abstract

Objective: Oscillometry is a lung function technique that has gained increasing interest because of its sensitivity to small airway dysfunction. Despite growing attention, important challenges still limit widespread clinical adoption. The current study aims to advance in Oscillometry analysis and reporting to improve repeatability, interpretability, and clinical applicability. Methods: Oscillometry, forced spirometry, and symptoms were measured at three time points, over a median follow-up of 602 days, in 170 patients with COPD (n=89, 52%), asthma (n=59, 35%), and bronchiectasis (n=22, 13%). We investigated: (1) intra-breath analysis; (2) several modelling strategies to derive a single oscillometry score for routine clinical interpretation; and (3) intra-individual variability. Outcomes were evaluated across three clinical scenarios: bronchodilator response, longitudinal follow-up, and exacerbations. Results: Intra-breath differences between inspiratory and expiratory phases (ΔX5 and ΔAX) reflected respiratory hysteresis but had poor repeatability (daily CoV: 200% and 70%, respectively). Resistance-related variables (R5, R5–20) showed lower sensitivity than reactance-related indices (AX, X5, Fres). An AX-based calibrated oscillometry score (AX-OS) provided the best index among the candidate models evaluated. AX-OS had higher repeatability (CoV 19%) than conventional oscillometry variables, and good clinical responsiveness across the three clinical scenarios assessed. Moreover, AX-OS showed potential for contributing to enhanced community-managed exacerbations through a hybrid care intervention. Conclusions: The findings support: (1) well-defined strategies to reduce intra-session variability, particularly through optimization of AX-derived measures; and (2) simplified clinical reporting approaches. AX-OS may improve interpretability and longitudinal assessment; however, independent validation in larger multicentre cohorts is needed before routine clinical applicability. Trial registration: NCT06421402. Keywords: forced oscillation technique; small airway; COPD; asthma; repeatability; biomarkers; respiratory mechanics.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Universidad de Valladolid (ES), "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati (RO), Servei de Salut de les Illes Balears (ES), Consorci d’Atenció Primària de Salut Barcelona Esquerra (ES), Circuit Therapeutics (United States) (US), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (ES), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona (ES), Catalan Society of Family and Community Medicine (ES), Institute for Sustainability (GB), Institut Català de la Salut (ES), Fundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomèdica (ES), Consorci Institut D'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (ES), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
European Commission
No poverty
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.