Individual militant democracy in EU institutions

The literature on whether militant democracy can be used to justify EU sanctions against Member States due to their democratic backsliding has so far focused on EU institutions and Member States as (potential) agents of militant democratic sanctions. Yet, militant democratic measures, in some circumstances, may also be imposed by individual agents on individuals who pose a threat to democracy. At the same time, new work in political ethics explores the duties and opportunities of individual political actors, such as Members of the European Parliament, to respond to backsliding in their collegial relations. In this article, we explore whether a militant democratic framework can justify such individual responses to democratic backsliding. We argue that, in principle, individual political actors such as MEPs, members of the European Council, Member State delegates on the Council, and COREPER officials can justifiably apply militant measures against colleagues who hold mandates or offices in a shared decision-making or supportive body of the EU and are elected in or delegated by undemocratic Member States. Such measures, while they would need to pass a high bar of normative justification, require no institutional reform to be implemented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Democratization
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2026.2701463
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Individual militant democracy in EU institutions

Attila Mráz, Tom Theuns
Democratization
European Union Policy and Governance
article

Individual militant democracy in EU institutions

Attila Mráz, Tom Theuns
article en

Abstract

The literature on whether militant democracy can be used to justify EU sanctions against Member States due to their democratic backsliding has so far focused on EU institutions and Member States as (potential) agents of militant democratic sanctions. Yet, militant democratic measures, in some circumstances, may also be imposed by individual agents on individuals who pose a threat to democracy. At the same time, new work in political ethics explores the duties and opportunities of individual political actors, such as Members of the European Parliament, to respond to backsliding in their collegial relations. In this article, we explore whether a militant democratic framework can justify such individual responses to democratic backsliding. We argue that, in principle, individual political actors such as MEPs, members of the European Council, Member State delegates on the Council, and COREPER officials can justifiably apply militant measures against colleagues who hold mandates or offices in a shared decision-making or supportive body of the EU and are elected in or delegated by undemocratic Member States. Such measures, while they would need to pass a high bar of normative justification, require no institutional reform to be implemented.

Democratization
Eötvös Loránd University (HU), Leiden University (NL), Environment Agency (GB), Institute of Political Science (PL)
Magyar Tudományos Akadémia, Eötvös Loránd Tudományegyetem
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
European Union Policy and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Individual militant democracy in EU institutions — Attila Mráz, Tom Theuns · Democratization (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS