A thematic analysis of users’ experience of an AI-enabled mental health intervention for generalised anxiety symptoms

Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent, yet access to effective psychological treatments remains limited. Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled mental health applications offer a scalable and accessible means to bridge treatment gaps. This study qualitatively explored the experiences of adults with anxiety symptoms using PATH, an AI-enabled mental health intervention. Participants (N = 100) with moderate-to-severe anxiety were recruited via Prolific and engaged with PATH before providing feedback. A total of 67 participants completed the qualitative questions at the 2-week timepoint, and 51 participants completed a further questionnaire at the 8-week timepoint. Participants had a mean age of 39.84 (SD = 11.19). Most were born in the UK (89.6%), and reported their ethnicity as White (92.5%), Asian (3.0%), mixed (3.0%) and Black (1.5%). Many worked full-time (53.7%) or part-time (20.9%), and a minority (14.9%) were students. Data were analysed using Qualitative Descriptive Analysis. Four overarching themes emerged: (1) Key Reasons for Use; (2) Usability and Functionality; (3) Preferred In-App Interventions; and (4) Facilitators and Barriers to Sustained Engagement. Findings underscore the value of empathetic, personalised and readily available AI-enabled interventions for anxiety management, while also highlighting design challenges requiring refinement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Behaviour and Information Technology
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929x.2026.2706675
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A thematic analysis of users’ experience of an AI-enabled mental health intervention for generalised anxiety symptoms

Lee Kannis‐Dymand, Nikolay Babakov, Cindy Davis, Geoff P. Lovell et al.
Behaviour and Information Technology
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

A thematic analysis of users’ experience of an AI-enabled mental health intervention for generalised anxiety symptoms

Lee Kannis‐Dymand, Nikolay Babakov, Cindy Davis, Geoff P. Lovell, Francine C. Jellesma, Zalia Powell, Juan Ramos‐Cejudo, Andrew Allen, Luke Balcombe, Evgeniia Ivanova, Anton Vorobev, Ani Gisnarian, V Stavropoulos, José M. Salguero
article en

Abstract

Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent, yet access to effective psychological treatments remains limited. Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled mental health applications offer a scalable and accessible means to bridge treatment gaps. This study qualitatively explored the experiences of adults with anxiety symptoms using PATH, an AI-enabled mental health intervention. Participants (N = 100) with moderate-to-severe anxiety were recruited via Prolific and engaged with PATH before providing feedback. A total of 67 participants completed the qualitative questions at the 2-week timepoint, and 51 participants completed a further questionnaire at the 8-week timepoint. Participants had a mean age of 39.84 (SD = 11.19). Most were born in the UK (89.6%), and reported their ethnicity as White (92.5%), Asian (3.0%), mixed (3.0%) and Black (1.5%). Many worked full-time (53.7%) or part-time (20.9%), and a minority (14.9%) were students. Data were analysed using Qualitative Descriptive Analysis. Four overarching themes emerged: (1) Key Reasons for Use; (2) Usability and Functionality; (3) Preferred In-App Interventions; and (4) Facilitators and Barriers to Sustained Engagement. Findings underscore the value of empathetic, personalised and readily available AI-enabled interventions for anxiety management, while also highlighting design challenges requiring refinement.

Behaviour and Information Technology
Griffith University (AU), University of the Sunshine Coast (AU), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Toray (United States) (US), MIT University (MK), Camilo José Cela University (ES), University of Worcester (GB), Universidad de Málaga (ES), RMIT University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.