Evaluation of Systematic and Random Errors in Occupancy Grid Maps

Abstract. Map evaluation for occupancy grid mapping (OGM) is critical in the field of high-definition mapping of the road environment for autonomous vehicles. Existing methods cannot adequately evaluate the systematic and random errors that might be present in OGM. This article introduces two evaluation metrics for OGM under LiDAR position uncertainty: Mean Signed Distance (MSD) and Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD). MSD quantifies systematic displacement of occupied cells, while MAD measures random error exhibited as boundary thickening. Unlike classification-based, probabilistic, and geometric metrics, MSD and MAD directly isolate displacement and thickening effects in OGM. We validate both metrics in a controlled synthetic environment and on a real indoor LiDAR dataset, showing better performance than conventional metrics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlix-b2-2026-477-2026
Primary Topic
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Systematic and Random Errors in Occupancy Grid Maps

Kourosh Khoshelham, Yuguang Liu, Marko Radanovic, Krista A. Ehinger
˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
article

Evaluation of Systematic and Random Errors in Occupancy Grid Maps

Kourosh Khoshelham, Yuguang Liu, Marko Radanovic, Krista A. Ehinger
article en

Abstract

Abstract. Map evaluation for occupancy grid mapping (OGM) is critical in the field of high-definition mapping of the road environment for autonomous vehicles. Existing methods cannot adequately evaluate the systematic and random errors that might be present in OGM. This article introduces two evaluation metrics for OGM under LiDAR position uncertainty: Mean Signed Distance (MSD) and Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD). MSD quantifies systematic displacement of occupied cells, while MAD measures random error exhibited as boundary thickening. Unlike classification-based, probabilistic, and geometric metrics, MSD and MAD directly isolate displacement and thickening effects in OGM. We validate both metrics in a controlled synthetic environment and on a real indoor LiDAR dataset, showing better performance than conventional metrics.

˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciencesVol. XLIX-B2-2026
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Robotics and Sensor-Based Localization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluation of Systematic and Random Errors in Occupancy Grid Maps — Kourosh Khoshelham, Yuguang Liu, et al. · ˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS