Problem solving in physics classes: Navigating fast and slow thinking

This paper examines the cognitive foundations of problem solving in introductory physics, drawing on Daniel Kahneman's dual-process theory and research on judgment and decision making. Students often struggle with problem analysis, mathematical reasoning, and cognitive biases. To address these challenges, the paper proposes a six-step problem-solving framework grounded in dual-process principles and integrates it with structured problem-solving journals. The framework and journals were implemented in university physics courses, where students were required to make their reasoning explicit in written homework. In a controlled classroom study, students who consistently applied the six-step structure in written journals scored 24% higher on average on the final exam than peers who completed only online homework. These findings illustrate how slowing down intuitive responses and examining assumptions allows students to engage more fully in analytical problem solving.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Physics
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1119/5.0269803
Primary Topic
Science Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Problem solving in physics classes: Navigating fast and slow thinking

Alexander Godunov
American Journal of Physics
Science Education and Pedagogy
article

Problem solving in physics classes: Navigating fast and slow thinking

Alexander Godunov
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the cognitive foundations of problem solving in introductory physics, drawing on Daniel Kahneman's dual-process theory and research on judgment and decision making. Students often struggle with problem analysis, mathematical reasoning, and cognitive biases. To address these challenges, the paper proposes a six-step problem-solving framework grounded in dual-process principles and integrates it with structured problem-solving journals. The framework and journals were implemented in university physics courses, where students were required to make their reasoning explicit in written homework. In a controlled classroom study, students who consistently applied the six-step structure in written journals scored 24% higher on average on the final exam than peers who completed only online homework. These findings illustrate how slowing down intuitive responses and examining assumptions allows students to engage more fully in analytical problem solving.

American Journal of PhysicsVol. 94(8)
Old Dominion University (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Science Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.