A Near-Peer Mentoring Framework for a CEE Curriculum: A Case Study

Abstract Many innovative pedagogical strategies, such as near-peer mentoring, have been developed to address challenges of the first-year college curriculum. Near-peer mentoring involves upper-level students mentoring lower-level students and has been shown to improve student outcomes, such as increased sense of belonging, increased confidence in abilities, and enhanced academic and professional growth. However, many of these programs primarily focus on the mentee and often overlook the mentor. Additionally, these programs can have high barriers to entry and may require extensive administrative support and infrastructure, especially for large classes. This paper presents a curriculum-level near-peer mentoring framework with the goals of (1) enhancing both mentors’ and mentees’ sense of belonging and identities as engineers, and (2) improving the quality of mentees’ semester-long team project solutions, conclusions, and final products. This framework was applied to a large first-year civil and environmental engineering (CEE) course with more than 210 mentees and uses more than 165 mentors primarily from fourth year CEE courses. Mentees and mentors were paired according to similar interests, and each pair met five times during a semester. After each mentoring session, both mentees and mentors completed mirrored surveys about their experiences. Both mentors and mentees somewhat agreed that the near-peer mentoring created a stronger sense of identity as a civil engineer, an increased sense of belonging, and higher quality project solutions, conclusions, and final products. Both groups rated the mentoring experience as beneficial with average self-reported scores of 3.7 out of 5, and both groups believed they helped their counterparts make connections with each other and to the project. Overall, this novel curriculum-level near-peer mentoring framework will allow all students to gain the many benefits of mentoring, and it scales well without additional faculty/teaching assistant (TA) resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1061/jceecd.eieng-2374
Primary Topic
Engineering Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Near-Peer Mentoring Framework for a CEE Curriculum: A Case Study

Casey Rodgers, Ramez Hajj, Ann C. Sychterz, Kellie Halloran et al.
Journal of Civil Engineering Education
Engineering Education and Pedagogy
article

A Near-Peer Mentoring Framework for a CEE Curriculum: A Case Study

Casey Rodgers, Ramez Hajj, Ann C. Sychterz, Kellie Halloran, Jacob Henschen, Arthur R. Schmidt, Afeefa Rahman, Jeffery Roesler
article en

Abstract

Abstract Many innovative pedagogical strategies, such as near-peer mentoring, have been developed to address challenges of the first-year college curriculum. Near-peer mentoring involves upper-level students mentoring lower-level students and has been shown to improve student outcomes, such as increased sense of belonging, increased confidence in abilities, and enhanced academic and professional growth. However, many of these programs primarily focus on the mentee and often overlook the mentor. Additionally, these programs can have high barriers to entry and may require extensive administrative support and infrastructure, especially for large classes. This paper presents a curriculum-level near-peer mentoring framework with the goals of (1) enhancing both mentors’ and mentees’ sense of belonging and identities as engineers, and (2) improving the quality of mentees’ semester-long team project solutions, conclusions, and final products. This framework was applied to a large first-year civil and environmental engineering (CEE) course with more than 210 mentees and uses more than 165 mentors primarily from fourth year CEE courses. Mentees and mentors were paired according to similar interests, and each pair met five times during a semester. After each mentoring session, both mentees and mentors completed mirrored surveys about their experiences. Both mentors and mentees somewhat agreed that the near-peer mentoring created a stronger sense of identity as a civil engineer, an increased sense of belonging, and higher quality project solutions, conclusions, and final products. Both groups rated the mentoring experience as beneficial with average self-reported scores of 3.7 out of 5, and both groups believed they helped their counterparts make connections with each other and to the project. Overall, this novel curriculum-level near-peer mentoring framework will allow all students to gain the many benefits of mentoring, and it scales well without additional faculty/teaching assistant (TA) resources.

Journal of Civil Engineering EducationVol. 152(4)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Engineering Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.