Haptic or Auditory? Effects of Feedback Mode and Motivation Type on Task Performance in Smart‐Device Interactions

ABSTRACT Consumers frequently encounter auditory feedback (via speakers) or haptic feedback (via vibrations) when interacting with smart devices. However, little is known about how these feedback modes influence sustained effortful task performance. Drawing on self‐determination theory and self‐awareness theory, we propose a motivational alignment perspective, suggesting that feedback effectiveness depends on its match with individuals' motivation type. Across four studies, we show that haptic feedback improves performance under intrinsic motivation, whereas auditory feedback improves performance under extrinsic motivation. This interaction occurs because haptic and auditory feedback differentially heighten private and public self‐awareness, respectively, thereby aligning with corresponding motivational states. Our findings clarify when and why device‐mediated sensory feedback supports sustained effortful task performance and offer implications for the design of interactive technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology and Marketing
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.70231
Primary Topic
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Haptic or Auditory? Effects of Feedback Mode and Motivation Type on Task Performance in Smart‐Device Interactions

Z Q Chen, Yu Zhang, J B Du, Binbin Song
Psychology and Marketing
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
article

Haptic or Auditory? Effects of Feedback Mode and Motivation Type on Task Performance in Smart‐Device Interactions

Z Q Chen, Yu Zhang, J B Du, Binbin Song
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Consumers frequently encounter auditory feedback (via speakers) or haptic feedback (via vibrations) when interacting with smart devices. However, little is known about how these feedback modes influence sustained effortful task performance. Drawing on self‐determination theory and self‐awareness theory, we propose a motivational alignment perspective, suggesting that feedback effectiveness depends on its match with individuals' motivation type. Across four studies, we show that haptic feedback improves performance under intrinsic motivation, whereas auditory feedback improves performance under extrinsic motivation. This interaction occurs because haptic and auditory feedback differentially heighten private and public self‐awareness, respectively, thereby aligning with corresponding motivational states. Our findings clarify when and why device‐mediated sensory feedback supports sustained effortful task performance and offer implications for the design of interactive technologies.

Psychology and Marketing
Tianjin University of Technology (CN), Nankai University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Haptic or Auditory? Effects of Feedback Mode and Motivation Type on Task Performance in Smart‐Device Interactions — Z Q Chen, Yu Zhang, et al. · Psychology and Marketing (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS