Balancing Founder Control and Investor Protection? A Comparative Study of DualClass Share Structures in the United Kingdom and China

In recent years, both the United Kingdom (UK) and China have relaxed regulatory restrictions on dual-class share (DCS) structures in an effort to enhance the attractiveness of their capital markets. However, this shift has also raised concerns about potential abuses of control and its implications for investor protection. From a comparative law perspective, this paper examines the listing regulatory frameworks governing DCS structures in both jurisdictions and explores the institutional logic and market dynamics that shape their respective approaches. Through a detailed analysis of the risks and limitations in current regulatory practices, it argues for a more balanced regulatory model that reconciles the need for control stability with the imperative of safeguarding investor interests. The paper further contends that the regulatory framework for DCS structures should remain adaptive, permitting dynamic adjustments in response to evolving institutional environments and market developments.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
European Business Law Review
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2026035
Primary Topic
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Balancing Founder Control and Investor Protection? A Comparative Study of DualClass Share Structures in the United Kingdom and China

Ting Hu
European Business Law Review
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
article

Balancing Founder Control and Investor Protection? A Comparative Study of DualClass Share Structures in the United Kingdom and China

Ting Hu
article en

Abstract

In recent years, both the United Kingdom (UK) and China have relaxed regulatory restrictions on dual-class share (DCS) structures in an effort to enhance the attractiveness of their capital markets. However, this shift has also raised concerns about potential abuses of control and its implications for investor protection. From a comparative law perspective, this paper examines the listing regulatory frameworks governing DCS structures in both jurisdictions and explores the institutional logic and market dynamics that shape their respective approaches. Through a detailed analysis of the risks and limitations in current regulatory practices, it argues for a more balanced regulatory model that reconciles the need for control stability with the imperative of safeguarding investor interests. The paper further contends that the regulatory framework for DCS structures should remain adaptive, permitting dynamic adjustments in response to evolving institutional environments and market developments.

European Business Law ReviewVol. 37(Issue 5)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Balancing Founder Control and Investor Protection? A Comparative Study of DualClass Share Structures in the United Kingdom and China — Ting Hu · European Business Law Review (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS