One Image, Twelve Mathematics: A Cross-Family Benchmark and the U-Shaped Editability of Image Representations

An image is always a matrix, but it can be re-expressed in many ways: as a sum over a Fourier, cosine, or wavelet basis, as a sparse combination of atoms from an overcomplete dictionary, as a handful of geometric primitives, as a small neural function of position, as an explicit closed-form formula, or as a code in the latent space of a generative model. This preprint carries one image across twelve such families, on a common set of benchmark images and at a common parameter budget, and asks a question the fidelity literature does not: when you edit the parameters, what happens to the image? Two measured results and one finding follow. First, at an equal parameter budget the twelve families reconstruct comparably (peak signal-to-noise ratio 27-35 dB); fidelity does not distinguish them. Second, an editability-locality metric does: a single coefficient of a global transform is spatially spread (Fourier 0.16, DCT 0.23 concentration) while a coefficient of a space-localized transform is essentially local (wavelet 0.999, KLT 1.0). The finding is that editability is U-shaped across the abstraction spectrum: it is high at two poles, the designed-structure pole (geometric primitives, sparse atoms, space-localized transforms, where humans built local meaningful coordinates) and the learned-manifold pole (disentangled generative directions), and it collapses toward noise in between, where perturbing a raw neural-field weight or a constant of a brittle fitted formula destroys the image. A parameter is both stable and meaningful only when it indexes a low-dimensional manifold of plausible images with locally disentangled coordinates. The manuscript gives the twelve families with their governing equations, the cross-family benchmark on six images (two purpose-driven figures generated deterministically from the committed artifact), the U-shaped editability finding, and the honest scope: arbitrary photographs do not reduce to compact, faithful, human-readable equations, and the results say where a representation's parameters are, and are not, a usable handle. Code and committed artifacts (MIT): https://github.com/fsantibanezleal/CAOS_IMGLAB .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21510993
Primary Topic
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
preprint

One Image, Twelve Mathematics: A Cross-Family Benchmark and the U-Shaped Editability of Image Representations

Felipe Santibañez-Leal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
preprint

One Image, Twelve Mathematics: A Cross-Family Benchmark and the U-Shaped Editability of Image Representations

Felipe Santibañez-Leal
preprint en

Abstract

An image is always a matrix, but it can be re-expressed in many ways: as a sum over a Fourier, cosine, or wavelet basis, as a sparse combination of atoms from an overcomplete dictionary, as a handful of geometric primitives, as a small neural function of position, as an explicit closed-form formula, or as a code in the latent space of a generative model. This preprint carries one image across twelve such families, on a common set of benchmark images and at a common parameter budget, and asks a question the fidelity literature does not: when you edit the parameters, what happens to the image? Two measured results and one finding follow. First, at an equal parameter budget the twelve families reconstruct comparably (peak signal-to-noise ratio 27-35 dB); fidelity does not distinguish them. Second, an editability-locality metric does: a single coefficient of a global transform is spatially spread (Fourier 0.16, DCT 0.23 concentration) while a coefficient of a space-localized transform is essentially local (wavelet 0.999, KLT 1.0). The finding is that editability is U-shaped across the abstraction spectrum: it is high at two poles, the designed-structure pole (geometric primitives, sparse atoms, space-localized transforms, where humans built local meaningful coordinates) and the learned-manifold pole (disentangled generative directions), and it collapses toward noise in between, where perturbing a raw neural-field weight or a constant of a brittle fitted formula destroys the image. A parameter is both stable and meaningful only when it indexes a low-dimensional manifold of plausible images with locally disentangled coordinates. The manuscript gives the twelve families with their governing equations, the cross-family benchmark on six images (two purpose-driven figures generated deterministically from the committed artifact), the U-shaped editability finding, and the honest scope: arbitrary photographs do not reduce to compact, faithful, human-readable equations, and the results say where a representation's parameters are, and are not, a usable handle. Code and committed artifacts (MIT): https://github.com/fsantibanezleal/CAOS_IMGLAB .

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Open University of Cyprus (CY)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.