Turkey’s adaptation to NATO (1952–62): elusive pursuit for security and prosperity

This article examines Turkey’s early NATO membership (1952–1962), arguing that differences between U.S. and British strategic priorities and Turkey’s economic expectations shaped alliance outcomes. Using a triangular Turkey – United States – Britain framework, it situates NATO within shifting regional power dynamics and highlights the interplay of alliance, geostrategic, and domestic factors. We posit that while the United States and Britain framed the alliance in predominantly in security terms, Ankara attached growing importance to economic assistance. Meanwhile, the shifting Anglo-American balance of influence and critical episodes such as the Jupiter missile crisis revealed the limits of alliance cohesion. It presents NATO as a contested rather than cohesive framework. The study contributes to Cold War alliance literature and underscores its contemporary relevance amid ongoing transatlantic tensions over burden-sharing, strategic alignment and alliance cohesion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14683857.2026.2704515
Primary Topic
Cyprus History, Politics, Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Turkey’s adaptation to NATO (1952–62): elusive pursuit for security and prosperity

Şuhnaz Yılmaz, Dilek Barlas
Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
Cyprus History, Politics, Society
article

Turkey’s adaptation to NATO (1952–62): elusive pursuit for security and prosperity

Şuhnaz Yılmaz, Dilek Barlas
article en

Abstract

This article examines Turkey’s early NATO membership (1952–1962), arguing that differences between U.S. and British strategic priorities and Turkey’s economic expectations shaped alliance outcomes. Using a triangular Turkey – United States – Britain framework, it situates NATO within shifting regional power dynamics and highlights the interplay of alliance, geostrategic, and domestic factors. We posit that while the United States and Britain framed the alliance in predominantly in security terms, Ankara attached growing importance to economic assistance. Meanwhile, the shifting Anglo-American balance of influence and critical episodes such as the Jupiter missile crisis revealed the limits of alliance cohesion. It presents NATO as a contested rather than cohesive framework. The study contributes to Cold War alliance literature and underscores its contemporary relevance amid ongoing transatlantic tensions over burden-sharing, strategic alignment and alliance cohesion.

Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies
Koç University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Cyprus History, Politics, Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Turkey’s adaptation to NATO (1952–62): elusive pursuit for security and prosperity — Şuhnaz Yılmaz, Dilek Barlas · Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS