“Leave the Ego at the Door”- Power Relations in Collaborative Social Service Governance

This paper explores the dynamics of power within collaborative social service governance, as experienced by social service workers engaged in efforts to influence social policies and welfare programs. Drawing on the street-level bureaucracy (SLB) framework, we investigate how these actors experience power in collaborative efforts for change and how they perceive its implications for outcomes. The study employs a phenomenological approach, based on in-depth semi-structured interviews with 20 social service workers in Israel and Germany. The findings reveal a nuanced understanding of power within collaborative arrangements and their broader contexts, categorized into four types of relational dynamics. We argue that recognizing power dynamics is essential for understanding SLBs’ collaborative efforts aimed at change. Finally, we propose a conceptual, holistic perspective for capturing this phenomenon.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Services Organizations Management Leadership & Governance
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2026.2705580
Primary Topic
Social Work Education and Practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Leave the Ego at the Door”- Power Relations in Collaborative Social Service Governance

Noga Pitowsky‐Nave, Lihi Lahat, T Klenk
Human Services Organizations Management Leadership & Governance
Social Work Education and Practice
article

“Leave the Ego at the Door”- Power Relations in Collaborative Social Service Governance

Noga Pitowsky‐Nave, Lihi Lahat, T Klenk
article en

Abstract

This paper explores the dynamics of power within collaborative social service governance, as experienced by social service workers engaged in efforts to influence social policies and welfare programs. Drawing on the street-level bureaucracy (SLB) framework, we investigate how these actors experience power in collaborative efforts for change and how they perceive its implications for outcomes. The study employs a phenomenological approach, based on in-depth semi-structured interviews with 20 social service workers in Israel and Germany. The findings reveal a nuanced understanding of power within collaborative arrangements and their broader contexts, categorized into four types of relational dynamics. We argue that recognizing power dynamics is essential for understanding SLBs’ collaborative efforts aimed at change. Finally, we propose a conceptual, holistic perspective for capturing this phenomenon.

Human Services Organizations Management Leadership & Governance
Bar-Ilan University (IL), Sapir College (IL), Helmut Schmidt University (DE), Concordia University (CA)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Social Work Education and Practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.