Uneven decentralization: political competition under asymmetry

Abstract This paper examines how asymmetric regional decentralization shapes political competition in democracies. While decentralization has expanded considerably since World War II, the political consequences of increasing asymmetries in the distribution of authority across regions within states remain poorly understood. Drawing on survey data from Belgium, Canada, Germany, and Spain, as well as panel data covering 709 legislative elections in 73 democracies between 1960 and 2018, we analyze how centralized, symmetrically decentralized, and asymmetrically decentralized territorial arrangements affect economic voting and party system nationalization. The results show that asymmetric decentralization weakens electoral accountability in national elections while strengthening it in regional elections. In addition, it contributes to greater territorial variation in patterns of partisan support, thereby reducing the nationalization of party systems. These findings highlight the distinctive political consequences of asymmetric decentralization for democratic representation and accountability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Annals of Regional Science
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-026-01531-5
Primary Topic
Political Systems and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uneven decentralization: political competition under asymmetry

Ignacio Lago, André Blais
The Annals of Regional Science
Political Systems and Governance
article

Uneven decentralization: political competition under asymmetry

Ignacio Lago, André Blais
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines how asymmetric regional decentralization shapes political competition in democracies. While decentralization has expanded considerably since World War II, the political consequences of increasing asymmetries in the distribution of authority across regions within states remain poorly understood. Drawing on survey data from Belgium, Canada, Germany, and Spain, as well as panel data covering 709 legislative elections in 73 democracies between 1960 and 2018, we analyze how centralized, symmetrically decentralized, and asymmetrically decentralized territorial arrangements affect economic voting and party system nationalization. The results show that asymmetric decentralization weakens electoral accountability in national elections while strengthening it in regional elections. In addition, it contributes to greater territorial variation in patterns of partisan support, thereby reducing the nationalization of party systems. These findings highlight the distinctive political consequences of asymmetric decentralization for democratic representation and accountability.

The Annals of Regional ScienceVol. 75(3)
Universitat Pompeu Fabra (ES), Université de Montréal (CA)
Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Agència de Gestió d'Ajuts Universitaris i de Recerca, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Political Systems and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Uneven decentralization: political competition under asymmetry — Ignacio Lago, André Blais · The Annals of Regional Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS