Allism: The Absolute All, Subjectivization, and Fulfilment

Allism begins with a simple metaphysical claim: reality has no exterior. The Absolute All is not a container filled with independently constituted things. It is the whole field of actuality, coherent possibility, relation, perspective, experience, and whatever can be experienced. Human beings are neither detached fragments of that whole nor appearances that disappear under analysis. Each person is a real first-person localisation through which the All is lived as one body, one biography, one place, one time, and one stream of experience. The subjectivization hypothesis names this localisation. It addresses a question that remains obscure in both reductive and non-dual accounts: how can an all-inclusive reality be given as this experience - here, now, and as mine - without placing the subject outside the reality it experiences? Allism answers that local limitation concerns access rather than ontological source. Time orders the availability of configurations to a perspective. Matter is a stable and intersubjectively coordinated mode of access. The body gives subjectivity a public address. Desire gives local experience direction. The paper adds a further thesis: the All should be understood through a verb as well as a noun. The phrase the All fulfils itself does not imply that the All begins deficient and later becomes whole. It means that what is complete in being becomes determinate, embodied, and lived through local subjectivizations. Fulfilment changes access, participation, and expression; it adds nothing to the extent of the All. Manifestation is one form of this fulfilment. It occurs when a selected possibility becomes an actual event in the relevant category: physical, relational, financial, institutional, or experiential. Agency is therefore analysed through an operative condition of unity. A local person and the All are not two causal agents passing a request between them; they are one process described at different scales. Within this unity, decision is the principal local operator: desire supplies direction, while decision specifies the intended terminal form of the one act. The wider transition dynamics generate and execute the route toward that form under embodiment, shared-world coherence, relation, consent, and unknown conditions; they do not constitute a second authority that approves the decision. Principal does not mean sole determinant. A completed decision is not already experienced fruit, and manifestation remains confirmed only by a category-matched result. This yields a strong but testable immediacy hypothesis: if operative unity is complete, no metaphysical relay is required between decision and fulfilment, and the interval before a shared result may collapse. The hypothesis is not protected from failure by redefining decision or inner conviction as external success. The fruit criterion remains decisive. Allism is offered as constructive metaphysics with empirical interfaces, not as an established physical theory. Its affinities with monism, process philosophy, radical empiricism, early Christian sources, neuroscience, quantum theory, and anomalous-experience literature are treated as lines of inquiry rather than borrowed proofs. A formal sketch, objections, and a research programme are included.