From courts to capital: how bankruptcy judicial reform affects corporate investment efficiency

Based on data from China’s A-share listed companies from 2014 to 2022, this paper uses the establishment of Chinese bankruptcy courts (BCs) as a quasi-natural experiment and employs a staggered difference-in-differences (DID) method to test the impact of bankruptcy judicial system reform on corporate investment efficiency. We find that after the reform, corporate investment efficiency significantly improved, with non-optimal investment efficiency decreasing by 7.5%, primarily due to a 9.7% reduction in underinvestment. The underlying mechanisms are that bankruptcy judicial reform improves financing expectations, strengthens governance, and optimizes resource allocation. This effect is more significant in non-state-owned enterprises, firms facing greater industry competition, and firms in regions with more developed financial systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-08435-x
Primary Topic
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From courts to capital: how bankruptcy judicial reform affects corporate investment efficiency

Yan Chen, Miao Miao, Xuanzi Zeng
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
article

From courts to capital: how bankruptcy judicial reform affects corporate investment efficiency

Yan Chen, Miao Miao, Xuanzi Zeng
article en

Abstract

Based on data from China’s A-share listed companies from 2014 to 2022, this paper uses the establishment of Chinese bankruptcy courts (BCs) as a quasi-natural experiment and employs a staggered difference-in-differences (DID) method to test the impact of bankruptcy judicial system reform on corporate investment efficiency. We find that after the reform, corporate investment efficiency significantly improved, with non-optimal investment efficiency decreasing by 7.5%, primarily due to a 9.7% reduction in underinvestment. The underlying mechanisms are that bankruptcy judicial reform improves financing expectations, strengthens governance, and optimizes resource allocation. This effect is more significant in non-state-owned enterprises, firms facing greater industry competition, and firms in regions with more developed financial systems.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Shandong University (CN), South China University of Technology (CN)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Corporate Insolvency and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From courts to capital: how bankruptcy judicial reform affects corporate investment efficiency — Yan Chen, Miao Miao, et al. · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS