Development and validation of a Ramathibodi Poison Center scoring system to predict follow-up necessity in hospitalized patients: a retrospective study

INTRODUCTION: The Ramathibodi Poison Center manages a substantial workload of 30,000-40,000 annual inquiries, placing significant strain on limited human resources. We aim to develop and validate a practical risk assessment score (Ramathibodi Poison Score) to predict in-hospital mortality among hospitalized poisoned patients, thereby facilitating evidence-based patient prioritization and resource allocation. METHODS: A retrospective study used a 9-year dataset partitioned into derivation cohort (70%) and internal validation cohort (30%), while a subsequent 1-year dataset (2025) served for temporal validation. Predictors were identified using multivariable logistic regression, and coefficients were transformed into a simplified integer-based score. RESULTS: A total of 105,342 cases were included in the primary analysis, with 5,578 cases for temporal validation. Independent predictors of mortality included pesticide exposure (the strongest predictor), unknown toxic substance, undetermined or intentional exposure, advanced age (>60 years), and male sex. The score demonstrated robust discrimination with AUC values of 0.828 (derivation), 0.831 (internal), and 0.753 (temporal). Calibration yielded an observed-to-expected (O:E) ratio of 1.000 in the derivation cohort, whereas initial temporal validation demonstrated an underestimation of mortality (O:E 1.528) due to shifting epidemiology. Following logistic recalibration, the O:E ratio in the temporal cohort was 1.000. The score stratified patients from low risk (score 0-5; 0.62% mortality, negative predictive value (NPV) 99.4%) to high risk (score ≥15; 22.22% mortality). DISCUSSION: The score addresses existing severity score limitations by stratifying risk before clinical deterioration. The robust NPV at the low-risk threshold confirms the safety of on-demand surveillance. Furthermore, initial temporal miscalibration highlights the dynamic nature of toxicology, emphasizing the need for periodic local recalibration against emerging threats. CONCLUSION: The Ramathibodi Poison Score utilizes simple variables to predict mortality with robust discrimination. It safely identifies low-risk patients for de-escalated surveillance. With necessary periodic recalibration, it provides a dynamic, evidence-based framework for efficient resource allocation as an adjunct to clinical judgment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Toxicology
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2026.2691830
Primary Topic
Poisoning and overdose treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of a Ramathibodi Poison Center scoring system to predict follow-up necessity in hospitalized patients: a retrospective study

Achara Tongpoo, Kitisak Sanprasert, Phantakan Tansuwannarat, Panee Rittilert et al.
Clinical Toxicology
Poisoning and overdose treatments
article

Development and validation of a Ramathibodi Poison Center scoring system to predict follow-up necessity in hospitalized patients: a retrospective study

Achara Tongpoo, Kitisak Sanprasert, Phantakan Tansuwannarat, Panee Rittilert, Satariya Trakulsrichai
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Ramathibodi Poison Center manages a substantial workload of 30,000-40,000 annual inquiries, placing significant strain on limited human resources. We aim to develop and validate a practical risk assessment score (Ramathibodi Poison Score) to predict in-hospital mortality among hospitalized poisoned patients, thereby facilitating evidence-based patient prioritization and resource allocation. METHODS: A retrospective study used a 9-year dataset partitioned into derivation cohort (70%) and internal validation cohort (30%), while a subsequent 1-year dataset (2025) served for temporal validation. Predictors were identified using multivariable logistic regression, and coefficients were transformed into a simplified integer-based score. RESULTS: A total of 105,342 cases were included in the primary analysis, with 5,578 cases for temporal validation. Independent predictors of mortality included pesticide exposure (the strongest predictor), unknown toxic substance, undetermined or intentional exposure, advanced age (>60 years), and male sex. The score demonstrated robust discrimination with AUC values of 0.828 (derivation), 0.831 (internal), and 0.753 (temporal). Calibration yielded an observed-to-expected (O:E) ratio of 1.000 in the derivation cohort, whereas initial temporal validation demonstrated an underestimation of mortality (O:E 1.528) due to shifting epidemiology. Following logistic recalibration, the O:E ratio in the temporal cohort was 1.000. The score stratified patients from low risk (score 0-5; 0.62% mortality, negative predictive value (NPV) 99.4%) to high risk (score ≥15; 22.22% mortality). DISCUSSION: The score addresses existing severity score limitations by stratifying risk before clinical deterioration. The robust NPV at the low-risk threshold confirms the safety of on-demand surveillance. Furthermore, initial temporal miscalibration highlights the dynamic nature of toxicology, emphasizing the need for periodic local recalibration against emerging threats. CONCLUSION: The Ramathibodi Poison Score utilizes simple variables to predict mortality with robust discrimination. It safely identifies low-risk patients for de-escalated surveillance. With necessary periodic recalibration, it provides a dynamic, evidence-based framework for efficient resource allocation as an adjunct to clinical judgment.

Clinical Toxicology
Mahidol University (TH), Ramathibodi Hospital (TH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Poisoning and overdose treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.