Don’t touch me now – the negative effects of text entry on a touchscreen while driving

OBJECTIVES: Limiting distraction while driving through in-vehicle information and communication systems is of critical importance for road safety. At the same time, touchscreens are increasingly used for the driver-car interaction in cars while driving. Operating touchscreens while driving uses the same human resources as driving itself. Therefore, it seems highly likely that the operation of touch displays can be more distracting than the operation of physical devices. The present simulation study investigates, how performing complex tasks requiring text entry on a touch display changes driving performance as compared to driving, only, and to a simple task using a physical haptic input device. METHODS: In order to quantify the effects, the ISO certified lane change task was used. In addition, a subjective measure of distraction was analyzed. Twenty-six students participated in a repeated-measures experiment with the distraction factor comprising a baseline, music title selection by touch, navigation adress input by touch, and selecting a radio station with an analogue button. RESULTS: The results show significant differences between these four conditions. Touch operation leads to greater mean deviation, longer reaction time, and poorer lane keeping compared to baseline driving and also compared to radio operation. CONCLUSION: Thus, operation of these somewhat complex functions via touch displays in the vehicle is not recommended due to the strong distracting effect. An alternative for the complex tasks could be speech input. Additionally, only simple tasks should be allowed on touchscreens while driving. However, further research is required to find out what implementations are exactly required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Traffic Injury Prevention
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2026.2696411
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Don’t touch me now – the negative effects of text entry on a touchscreen while driving

Mark Vollrath, M. Liebl
Traffic Injury Prevention
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Don’t touch me now – the negative effects of text entry on a touchscreen while driving

Mark Vollrath, M. Liebl
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Limiting distraction while driving through in-vehicle information and communication systems is of critical importance for road safety. At the same time, touchscreens are increasingly used for the driver-car interaction in cars while driving. Operating touchscreens while driving uses the same human resources as driving itself. Therefore, it seems highly likely that the operation of touch displays can be more distracting than the operation of physical devices. The present simulation study investigates, how performing complex tasks requiring text entry on a touch display changes driving performance as compared to driving, only, and to a simple task using a physical haptic input device. METHODS: In order to quantify the effects, the ISO certified lane change task was used. In addition, a subjective measure of distraction was analyzed. Twenty-six students participated in a repeated-measures experiment with the distraction factor comprising a baseline, music title selection by touch, navigation adress input by touch, and selecting a radio station with an analogue button. RESULTS: The results show significant differences between these four conditions. Touch operation leads to greater mean deviation, longer reaction time, and poorer lane keeping compared to baseline driving and also compared to radio operation. CONCLUSION: Thus, operation of these somewhat complex functions via touch displays in the vehicle is not recommended due to the strong distracting effect. An alternative for the complex tasks could be speech input. Additionally, only simple tasks should be allowed on touchscreens while driving. However, further research is required to find out what implementations are exactly required.

Traffic Injury Prevention
Technische Universität Braunschweig (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.