An observational study evaluating the environmental impact of equine arthroscopy

Abstract Background Human pressures on Earth's life‒support systems have exceeded multiple planetary boundaries, highlighting the need for sectors, including veterinary healthcare, to reduce environmental impacts. Methods A prospective convenience sample of 10 horses undergoing arthroscopy at a UK equine hospital between January and March 2025 was studied. Data were collected on anaesthesia, volatile capture, pharmaceuticals, single‐use consumables, waste, building energy and travel by horses and staff. Carbon emissions (kgCO 2 e) were calculated using published conversion factors. A hybrid methodology combined bottom‒up process‐based calculations with environmentally extended input–output (EEIO) modelling where primary data were unavailable. Results Total emissions from the 10 procedures were 2044 kgCO 2 e. Transport was the largest contributor (42%), followed by single‐use consumables (21%), pharmaceuticals (11%), waste (3%) and building energy (<1%). Owner transport (median distance 251 km) accounted for 86% of travel emissions. The Vet‐Can captured 490 g of isoflurane over 1199 minutes, with a median in vivo transfer efficiency of 39%. Limitations Findings were constrained by emission factor availability, system‐boundary inconsistencies, reliance on EEIO modelling and a small single‐site sample, limiting generalisability. Volatile anaesthetic impact should be interpreted cautiously, as CO 2 e‐based quantification remains contentious. Conclusions Transport and single‐use consumables represent priority targets for sustainability interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Veterinary Record
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/vetr.70981
Primary Topic
Climate Change and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An observational study evaluating the environmental impact of equine arthroscopy

Florence E. Hillen, Kate White, Rob Shipman, John Hird et al.
Veterinary Record
Climate Change and Health Impacts
article

An observational study evaluating the environmental impact of equine arthroscopy

Florence E. Hillen, Kate White, Rob Shipman, John Hird, Christian Byrne, Polly Taylor
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Human pressures on Earth's life‒support systems have exceeded multiple planetary boundaries, highlighting the need for sectors, including veterinary healthcare, to reduce environmental impacts. Methods A prospective convenience sample of 10 horses undergoing arthroscopy at a UK equine hospital between January and March 2025 was studied. Data were collected on anaesthesia, volatile capture, pharmaceuticals, single‐use consumables, waste, building energy and travel by horses and staff. Carbon emissions (kgCO 2 e) were calculated using published conversion factors. A hybrid methodology combined bottom‒up process‐based calculations with environmentally extended input–output (EEIO) modelling where primary data were unavailable. Results Total emissions from the 10 procedures were 2044 kgCO 2 e. Transport was the largest contributor (42%), followed by single‐use consumables (21%), pharmaceuticals (11%), waste (3%) and building energy (<1%). Owner transport (median distance 251 km) accounted for 86% of travel emissions. The Vet‐Can captured 490 g of isoflurane over 1199 minutes, with a median in vivo transfer efficiency of 39%. Limitations Findings were constrained by emission factor availability, system‐boundary inconsistencies, reliance on EEIO modelling and a small single‐site sample, limiting generalisability. Volatile anaesthetic impact should be interpreted cautiously, as CO 2 e‐based quantification remains contentious. Conclusions Transport and single‐use consumables represent priority targets for sustainability interventions.

Veterinary Record
University of Nottingham (GB), Bridgepoint (United Kingdom) (GB), Taylor Wimpey (United Kingdom) (GB)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Climate Change and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.