Assessing the sensibility of intervisibility on the quality of 3D geometry

Abstract. This work explores a new evaluation framework for 3D Model Quality Assessment using 3D intervisibility, a critical concept in 3D spatial analysis. In this work we will consider a high-quality LiDAR ground-truth 3D model and lower quality (dense matching and decimated) versions of it. Then we run the same intervisibility analysis on all of them and compare the results. This will allow us to evaluate the impact of geometric quality on intervisibility analysis. This analysis is useful for anyone using 3D data for simulations, as it indicates what data quality they actually need to purchase or produce for their specific use case. Ultimately, the goal of this work is to see how much the quality of the 3D model affects intervisibility results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlix-b2-2026-577-2026
Primary Topic
3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the sensibility of intervisibility on the quality of 3D geometry

Bruno Vallet, Darshan Venkatarayappa, Teng Wu
˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences
3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
article

Assessing the sensibility of intervisibility on the quality of 3D geometry

Bruno Vallet, Darshan Venkatarayappa, Teng Wu
article en

Abstract

Abstract. This work explores a new evaluation framework for 3D Model Quality Assessment using 3D intervisibility, a critical concept in 3D spatial analysis. In this work we will consider a high-quality LiDAR ground-truth 3D model and lower quality (dense matching and decimated) versions of it. Then we run the same intervisibility analysis on all of them and compare the results. This will allow us to evaluate the impact of geometric quality on intervisibility analysis. This analysis is useful for anyone using 3D data for simulations, as it indicates what data quality they actually need to purchase or produce for their specific use case. Ultimately, the goal of this work is to see how much the quality of the 3D model affects intervisibility results.

˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciencesVol. XLIX-B2-2026
Université Gustave Eiffel (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
3D Modeling in Geospatial Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Assessing the sensibility of intervisibility on the quality of 3D geometry — Bruno Vallet, Darshan Venkatarayappa, et al. · ˜The œinternational archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences/International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS