University students’ exposure to mobbing through assessment: the neglected dark side of educational evaluation

This study aims to investigate university students’ perceptions about being exposed to mobbing through assessment processes, and to understand the effects of factors including students’ gender, academic title of instructor, and enrolled faculty. Research data were collected from 1048 university students (Female = 541 and male = 507) studying at four different faculties of a medium-scale university in Turkey. ‘Mobbing through Measurement and Evaluation Scale’ was used to collect data. A 2 × 4 × 4 three-way ANOVA design was used to test the main and interaction effects of independent variables. The results suggested that participating students perceive themselves exposed to moderate level of mobbing through assessment in general. The highest level of mobbing was applied to male students by Assistant Professors at the Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences. In general, female students suffer less mobbing through assessment, with the lowest levels of mobbing seen at the Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences by Associate Professors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Further and Higher Education
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2026.2705570
Primary Topic
Workplace Violence and Bullying
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

University students’ exposure to mobbing through assessment: the neglected dark side of educational evaluation

Süleyman Nihat Şad, Niyazi Özer, Nuri Erdemi̇r, Meltem Yurtçu
Journal of Further and Higher Education
Workplace Violence and Bullying
article

University students’ exposure to mobbing through assessment: the neglected dark side of educational evaluation

Süleyman Nihat Şad, Niyazi Özer, Nuri Erdemi̇r, Meltem Yurtçu
article en

Abstract

This study aims to investigate university students’ perceptions about being exposed to mobbing through assessment processes, and to understand the effects of factors including students’ gender, academic title of instructor, and enrolled faculty. Research data were collected from 1048 university students (Female = 541 and male = 507) studying at four different faculties of a medium-scale university in Turkey. ‘Mobbing through Measurement and Evaluation Scale’ was used to collect data. A 2 × 4 × 4 three-way ANOVA design was used to test the main and interaction effects of independent variables. The results suggested that participating students perceive themselves exposed to moderate level of mobbing through assessment in general. The highest level of mobbing was applied to male students by Assistant Professors at the Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences. In general, female students suffer less mobbing through assessment, with the lowest levels of mobbing seen at the Faculty of Economics & Administrative Sciences by Associate Professors.

Journal of Further and Higher Education
Inonu University (TR)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Workplace Violence and Bullying
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

University students’ exposure to mobbing through assessment: the neglected dark side of educational evaluation — Süleyman Nihat Şad, Niyazi Özer, et al. · Journal of Further and Higher Education (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS