Identification of implementation strategies using the CFIR-ERIC matching tool to address barriers in mobility assistive technology provision in Saudi Arabian hospitals

PURPOSE: Mobility-assistive technology (MAT) faces significant global implementation barriers. This study applied a Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) matching tools to identify barriers to MAT provision in Saudi Arabia and generate evidence-based implementation strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We triangulated findings from two published studies: a scoping review of barriers to MAT and a mixed-methods study of Saudi Arabian hospitals, including survey data, semi-structured interviews, and policy document analysis. Barriers were identified, mapped to the CFIR constructs, and translated into strategies using the CFIR-ERIC Matching Tool. RESULTS: = 13, 26%) were the predominant strategies. Top-ranked strategies included "identify and prepare champions" "conduct educational meetings", and "assess for readiness", demonstrating applicability across multiple barriers. CONCLUSION: The application of implementation science frameworks is a useful way to identify evidence-based strategies to address barriers to MAT provision. The predominance of planning and education strategies, reflecting endorsements from implementation science experts, suggests that systematic preparation and knowledge dissemination are fundamental to improving MAT accessibility. The findings provide actionable guidance for stakeholders in Saudi Arabia and similar settings. Future research should empirically evaluate strategy effectiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2026.2699837
Primary Topic
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identification of implementation strategies using the CFIR-ERIC matching tool to address barriers in mobility assistive technology provision in Saudi Arabian hospitals

Becky Field, Simon Rushton, Daniel Hind, Asma Aldawood
Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
article

Identification of implementation strategies using the CFIR-ERIC matching tool to address barriers in mobility assistive technology provision in Saudi Arabian hospitals

Becky Field, Simon Rushton, Daniel Hind, Asma Aldawood
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Mobility-assistive technology (MAT) faces significant global implementation barriers. This study applied a Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) matching tools to identify barriers to MAT provision in Saudi Arabia and generate evidence-based implementation strategies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We triangulated findings from two published studies: a scoping review of barriers to MAT and a mixed-methods study of Saudi Arabian hospitals, including survey data, semi-structured interviews, and policy document analysis. Barriers were identified, mapped to the CFIR constructs, and translated into strategies using the CFIR-ERIC Matching Tool. RESULTS: = 13, 26%) were the predominant strategies. Top-ranked strategies included "identify and prepare champions" "conduct educational meetings", and "assess for readiness", demonstrating applicability across multiple barriers. CONCLUSION: The application of implementation science frameworks is a useful way to identify evidence-based strategies to address barriers to MAT provision. The predominance of planning and education strategies, reflecting endorsements from implementation science experts, suggests that systematic preparation and knowledge dissemination are fundamental to improving MAT accessibility. The findings provide actionable guidance for stakeholders in Saudi Arabia and similar settings. Future research should empirically evaluate strategy effectiveness.

Disability and Rehabilitation Assistive Technology
University of Leeds (GB), King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences (SA), Leeds Community Healthcare NHS Trust (GB), School of International Relations (IR), King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (SA), National Guard Health Affairs (SA), University of Sheffield (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.