Peirce, Abduction, and Inverse Problems in the Geosciences

Abstract Charles Peirce’s most well-known contribution to logic and scientific methodology is his account of abduction . However, what exactly Peirce meant by abduction is subject to perennial dispute. My aim in this paper is two-fold: First, I interpret Peirce’s abduction through the lens of his research in geophysics and argue this supports interpreting it as a kind of inverse modeling. Second, I show that the methods Peirce outlined for managing the underdetermination of abductive inferences are the same as those deployed by geoscientists to manage the nonuniqueness of geophysical inversions. I conclude by emphasizing the value of reintegrating Peirce-the-Philosopher with Peirce-the-Geoscientist.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy of Science
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2026.10263
Primary Topic
History of Science and Natural History
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Peirce, Abduction, and Inverse Problems in the Geosciences

Alisa Bokulich
Philosophy of Science
History of Science and Natural History
article

Peirce, Abduction, and Inverse Problems in the Geosciences

Alisa Bokulich
article en

Abstract

Abstract Charles Peirce’s most well-known contribution to logic and scientific methodology is his account of abduction . However, what exactly Peirce meant by abduction is subject to perennial dispute. My aim in this paper is two-fold: First, I interpret Peirce’s abduction through the lens of his research in geophysics and argue this supports interpreting it as a kind of inverse modeling. Second, I show that the methods Peirce outlined for managing the underdetermination of abductive inferences are the same as those deployed by geoscientists to manage the nonuniqueness of geophysical inversions. I conclude by emphasizing the value of reintegrating Peirce-the-Philosopher with Peirce-the-Geoscientist.

Philosophy of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
History of Science and Natural History
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.