Prognostic nutritional index and survival outcomes in cervical cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Cervical cancer is one of the most common malignancies among women globally. The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) has been widely explored in cervical cancer studies, but its prognostic value has remained inconsistent across studies. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the prognostic significance of PNI in cervical cancer. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to July 13, 2025. Studies analyzing the association between PNI and clinical outcomes were retrieved. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to assess robustness and identify potential sources of heterogeneity. This analysis included 17 studies, which were divided into 22 independent cohorts with 5,007 patients. Pooled multivariate-adjusted HRs showed that lower PNI was significantly associated with worse OS (HR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.37–1.79) and PFS (HR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.29–1.82). Significant heterogeneity was observed for both OS and PFS (OS: I² = 79%; PFS: I² = 72%). Subgroup analysis suggested that age, study region, sample size, and PNI cut-off value were the primary sources of heterogeneity. In the single study conducted in India and in studies with a PNI cut-off value < 48, the association between PNI and PFS was not statistically significant. Low PNI was significantly associated with poor OS and PFS in cervical cancer patients. A PNI cut-off value ≥ 48 was associated with prognostic outcomes and may serve as a preliminary reference for clinical risk stratification. However, this finding is exploratory. Due to heterogeneity, publication bias, and residual confounding factors, the independent prognostic value of PNI should be interpreted with caution. Large-scale, multi-center prospective studies are needed to further validate the prognostic value of PNI across different populations and to explore its standardized cut-off value.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Women s Health
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-026-04511-1
Primary Topic
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic nutritional index and survival outcomes in cervical cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Shanshan Wu, Tang Sc
BMC Women s Health
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
article

Prognostic nutritional index and survival outcomes in cervical cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Shanshan Wu, Tang Sc
article en

Abstract

Cervical cancer is one of the most common malignancies among women globally. The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) has been widely explored in cervical cancer studies, but its prognostic value has remained inconsistent across studies. This meta-analysis aimed to explore the prognostic significance of PNI in cervical cancer. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to July 13, 2025. Studies analyzing the association between PNI and clinical outcomes were retrieved. The main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled hazard ratios (HRs) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were performed to assess robustness and identify potential sources of heterogeneity. This analysis included 17 studies, which were divided into 22 independent cohorts with 5,007 patients. Pooled multivariate-adjusted HRs showed that lower PNI was significantly associated with worse OS (HR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.37–1.79) and PFS (HR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.29–1.82). Significant heterogeneity was observed for both OS and PFS (OS: I² = 79%; PFS: I² = 72%). Subgroup analysis suggested that age, study region, sample size, and PNI cut-off value were the primary sources of heterogeneity. In the single study conducted in India and in studies with a PNI cut-off value < 48, the association between PNI and PFS was not statistically significant. Low PNI was significantly associated with poor OS and PFS in cervical cancer patients. A PNI cut-off value ≥ 48 was associated with prognostic outcomes and may serve as a preliminary reference for clinical risk stratification. However, this finding is exploratory. Due to heterogeneity, publication bias, and residual confounding factors, the independent prognostic value of PNI should be interpreted with caution. Large-scale, multi-center prospective studies are needed to further validate the prognostic value of PNI across different populations and to explore its standardized cut-off value.

BMC Women s Health
Sichuan University (CN), West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University (CN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Inflammatory Biomarkers in Disease Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.