Results for Adults with Asymmetric Hearing Loss Who Receive a Cochlear Implant

Objectives: To collate subjective and objective outcome measures from cochlear implant recipients with asymmetric hearing loss. Methods: Forty-one CI recipients with asymmetrical hearing loss completed spatially separated speech in noise testing, speech in quiet testing, localisation testing, and tinnitus and quality of life questionnaires (SSQ and IOI-HA) pre-operatively and at 3, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. The results were used to generate a tool to help clinicians guide potential recipients through the counselling process. Results: Significant improvements in spatially separated SRT, localisation, tinnitus and the SSQ were observed for the group, with significant individual variability. CVC phoneme scores were not significantly different from those observed for CI recipients with bilateral hearing loss. The rates of non-use were consistent with those in the literature and were higher than for recipients with bilateral hearing loss. There was a significant correlation between PTA in the contralateral ear and localisation, and those recipients with a shorter duration of hearing loss were more likely to be satisfied with their CI. Discussion: Cochlear implantation for patients with asymmetrical hearing loss has the potential to offer improvements in head-shadow effects, localisation and tinnitus, with subjective measures also showing significant improvements post-operatively. There exists a large amount of individual variability across the group, however, which makes pre-operative counselling problematic for this patient cohort. Conclusions: The use of the study-generated counselling tool by clinicians may help patients make a more educated decision to proceed with implantation based upon realistic expectations of possible post-operative outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Audiology Research
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres16040102
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Results for Adults with Asymmetric Hearing Loss Who Receive a Cochlear Implant

Sylvia Tari, Raoul Wills, Alexandra Rousset, Richard C. Dowell et al.
Audiology Research
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
article

Results for Adults with Asymmetric Hearing Loss Who Receive a Cochlear Implant

Sylvia Tari, Raoul Wills, Alexandra Rousset, Richard C. Dowell, Rod Hollow
article en

Abstract

Objectives: To collate subjective and objective outcome measures from cochlear implant recipients with asymmetric hearing loss. Methods: Forty-one CI recipients with asymmetrical hearing loss completed spatially separated speech in noise testing, speech in quiet testing, localisation testing, and tinnitus and quality of life questionnaires (SSQ and IOI-HA) pre-operatively and at 3, 12 and 24 months post-operatively. The results were used to generate a tool to help clinicians guide potential recipients through the counselling process. Results: Significant improvements in spatially separated SRT, localisation, tinnitus and the SSQ were observed for the group, with significant individual variability. CVC phoneme scores were not significantly different from those observed for CI recipients with bilateral hearing loss. The rates of non-use were consistent with those in the literature and were higher than for recipients with bilateral hearing loss. There was a significant correlation between PTA in the contralateral ear and localisation, and those recipients with a shorter duration of hearing loss were more likely to be satisfied with their CI. Discussion: Cochlear implantation for patients with asymmetrical hearing loss has the potential to offer improvements in head-shadow effects, localisation and tinnitus, with subjective measures also showing significant improvements post-operatively. There exists a large amount of individual variability across the group, however, which makes pre-operative counselling problematic for this patient cohort. Conclusions: The use of the study-generated counselling tool by clinicians may help patients make a more educated decision to proceed with implantation based upon realistic expectations of possible post-operative outcomes.

Audiology ResearchVol. 16(4)
Cochlear (Australia) (AU), Burnet Institute (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), The Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital (AU)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.